The subject heading should be exaeuclid, not exaEuclid. If the name were to be adopted, it would, like all other units named after people, be all lower case.
Bill Potts, CMS Roseville, CA http://metric1.org [SI Navigator] >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Behalf Of John Nichols >Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 11:55 >To: U.S. Metric Association >Subject: [USMA:25235] exaEuclid > > >There are 5900 eE for the mass of the earth. > >>X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Unverified) >>Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 14:38:52 -0500 >>To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>From: "Joseph B. Reid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Subject: [USMA:25233] Re: Back to topic with Planck units >>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>Han in USMA 25226 gave references to the so-called Planck units. Until >>the Planck base units can determined with greater precision than the SI >>base units, there is no chance that they will be adopted in >>experimental science, engineering and commerce. >> >>-- >>Joseph B. Reid >>17 Glebe Road West >>Toronto M5P 1C8 Telephone 416-486-6071 > >John Nichols BE, Ph.D. (Newcastle), MIE (Aust), Chartered Professional >Engineer >Assistant Professor >Texas A&M University >Department of Construction Science >Langford AC >Rm: A414 MD 3137 >College Station, TX 77843-3137 > >Electronic mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Telephone: 979 845 6541 >Facsimile: 979 862 1572 >
