>Of Bill Potts >I hate to break this to you, but the letter m is both a unit and a prefix, >so it's not as if there wouldn't be a precedent.
I had not noticed. Thanks for pointing it out. >Also, if we were to replace da, h and k, with D, H and K (as has often >been recommended), K would be both a unit and a prefix. I tidy up of the SI system would perhaps include abandoning prefixes that are not multiples of 1000. So we would no longer need the following prefixes: 'h', 'da', 'd' or 'c'. Thus we would only need to deal with one anomaly of lower case i.e. 'k'.
