No, it doesn't. The weight given is for 2000 letter-size pages, even if
you're buying a different size.

Thus it is the weight (or, correctly, mass) of a fixed, standard area of
that particular paper, even though the area is only implied. Four reams of
legal size would indeed weigh 25.5 pounds, but the four packages would be
marked "20 lb (75 g/m^2)." Without that consistency, how would you know you
were getting the right paper (without using a calculator)?

Letter and legal size are not, by the way, the same as quarto and foolscap.

As I do mostly duplex (double-sided printing), I use 90 g/m^2 (24 lb) paper,
with a brightness index of 96 (almost perfectly white). It's closer to
opaque than the more common lighter weight paper.

Bill Potts, CMS
Roseville, CA
http://metric1.org [SI Navigator]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Behalf Of Jon Saxton
>Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 06:19
>To: U.S. Metric Association
>Subject: [USMA:26717] Re: paper weight
>
>
>** Reply to note from "Bill Potts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed,
>27 Aug 2003
>18:43:55 -0700
>
>Does this mean that if I buy 8.5"x11" and 8.5"x14" paper of the
>same quality
>it'll have different weight labelling?  20 lb paper in letter size (quarto)
>would be equivalent to about 25.5 lb in legal size (foolscap).
>
>Surely that can't be right?!
>
>
>> No, Joe, it's 2000 sheets (4 reams) of 8.5"x 11" paper.
>>
>> Converting the 20 lb/2000 sheets to g/m^2:
>>
>> 20*454/(8.5*11*0.0254*0.0254*2000) = 75.26 (or, approximately 75)
>>
>> The numerator is 20 pounds expressed as grams. The denominator
>is the area
>> of 2000 letter-size sheets in square meters.
>>
>> To perform the calculation, just use the expression on the left of the
>> equals sign as a Google search argument.
>>
>> Bill Potts, CMS
>> Roseville, CA
>> http://metric1.org [SI Navigator]
>
>--
>Jon Saxton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Developer of cross-platform software for
>UNIX, Windows and OS/2
>U.S. agent for Triton Technologies International Ltd
>http://www.triton.vg/

Reply via email to