2003-10-29 Do people really bother to calculate fuel consumption? I don't. I don't know anyone who does either.
If you are going to go through the bother of doing it and can't decide which is the best method, do it both ways. You'll need a calculator to figure out the results anyway, so what is wrong with one or two extra steps to convert it into the other form? Euric ----- Original Message ----- From: "John S. Ward" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, 2003-10-28 22:59 Subject: [USMA:27340] Fuel economy (was What did you do for US National Metric Week?) > On Monday 27 October 2003 14:37, Kim, Richard wrote: > > It also has other statistics, like for gas "mileage." Does anyone know why > > gas consumption in metric is liters per 100 kilometers? Why isn't > > kilometers per liter the standard, like MPG? > > I think the European system makes it ever-so-slightly easier to calculate the > cost of fuel for typical usage. For example, > > "I'm going on a 200 km trip, and my car uses 8 liters per 100 km. I will use > 2*8 = 16 liters. At 1.10 Euro/L, it will cost me 17.60 Euros." > > Also, this is in some ways more natural since you are directly measuring > consumption. It's very intuitive to me how one measures consumption. In > America, we measure economy. I think measuring "economy" is less intuitive. > > Nonetheless, I think Americans should probably continue to measure fuel > economy, and quote specification in km/L. For one thing, it is more SI-like. > Also, the American people are very use to bigger numbers being better. > Inverting this would create confusion and bad press for metrication. > > What do others here think? Is there already a precedent (legal or otherwise) > in place? > >
