On Thursday 2003 November 27 11:15, Mighty Chimp wrote:
....
> The company who produced this product (Procter & Gamble) could make this
> product alone a case point for allowing metric only labels. If they
> produce a metric only label for the Canadian market, but over-produce it
> and end up selling it in the US, they now have the added expense of an
> add-on label to make it comply with present laws. I'm sure other
> companies go through this same situation.
Yes, as noted in MT following last year's FPLA Forum, P&G is a strong
proponent of permissible metric-only labeling.
> Were the views of the woman from the TABD in favor of metric only
> labeling or not? Can you elaborate? If not, can you just give us a
> brief summary of her views? What is the TABD doing to prepare for the
> 2010 date?
>
> How many states now allow metric only labeling? Is it more then half?
I could elaborate but I would rather let you read the details in Metric
Today. Providing information of that sort is one of the purposes of that
publication.
Jim
