Proctor and Gamble has been doing that properly for years.  Downy fabric
softener is listed as 1.2 L (40 oz) rather than 1.18L (40 oz).  Dawn
dish detergent is listed as 740 ml (25 oz), rather than 739 ml (25 oz).
They obviously put some thinking into their rounding, others can too if
they try.

Nat    

-----Original Message-----
From: Chimpsarecute [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Saturday, 2004 February 28 13:29
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; U.S. Metric Association
Subject: Re: [USMA:28997] Wisconsin Ice Cream


And another thing.  Businesses need to be aware of sloppy numeration.
To have something in exact ounces, yet show a conversion to metric in
two or more decimals is totally asinine  Conversions should be rounded
to practical numbers where it won't affect the actual contents
description.  And where it would, to the nearest whole number in either
grams, or millilitres. Decimals to one place would be ok with litres and
kilograms.

For example: Either 1 lb 450 g or 1 lb 454 g, but never 1 lb 453.6 g, or
1 gallon 3.8 L  but not 1 gallon 3.785 L.

If consumers see funny numbers in metric it will turn them off to
metrication.  However if metrication results in rational metrication of
sizes consumers might find metric acceptable.  If Canada can be used as
an example, one finds coolness to metrication because of the lack of
rationalisation of products.

Government enforcement of metrication should require a rationalisation
of product sizes to rounded metric amounts for a period of either 5 or
10 years.  Long enough to get people adjusted and happy with metric.
After that the rules can be relaxed, and hopefully if sloppiness starts
to enter, "market forces" or limited rationalisation would keep
reversion from taking place.

Euric



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Nat Hager III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, 2004-02-28 09:57
Subject: [USMA:28997] Wisconsin Ice Cream


> Good.  Sends a message that metric labeling is a serious contents 
> declaration, not just compliance with government regulations.
>
> http://www.wisinfo.com/heraldtimes/news/archive/local_14939989.shtml
>
> Nat
>
>

Reply via email to