|
Many. France and Germany for one made their versions
of the pound equal to 500 g at the moment of metrication. The Chinese jin
is also 500g.
The changes may have been done legally, but over time
the laws allowing the legal use of these units have been changed to require only
metric units and devices as legal for trade. Thus if someone asks for a
pound and is given something else, they may or may not have recourse in a court
of law.
There is a big difference between a unit being illegal and
a unit being non-legal. In the first case, the use of the unit is
forbidden in the second case the unit isn't forbidden per se but it is not
protected by law and thus the user(s) use this unit at their own risk. In
this case the transaction is always carried out in the legal unit. The only
thing a court would go by is what is printed on the receipt and not what was
spoken.
One thing of interest would be the status of the pound in
Canada. Is the pound in Canada legal for trade? If not, despite the
moratorium, a shop clerk does not have to follow the 454 g definition. A
clerk may vend 500 g or whatever if he/she chooses. Fraud and cheating
would only take place if the customer paid more then what was
advertised.
For example: If ham was advertised as 0.99 $/100 g and a
person asking for a pound was given exactly 500 g and charged 4.95 $ for the
ham, then no fraud took place. Providing the pound is, under the law, a
non-legal unit in trade. If the customer was given 450 g and charged for
500 g, then fraud did take place. In many places now a days it is
hard to commit fraud as machines have pre-programmed pricing and a computerised
scale weighs and calculates the cost and prints a label.
Euric
|
- [USMA:29257] 500 g pound john mercer
- [USMA:29263] Re: 500 g pound Chimpsarecute
- [USMA:29263] Re: 500 g pound Pat Naughtin
- [USMA:29266] Re: 500 g pound Chimpsarecute
- [USMA:29267] Re: 500 g pound Bill Potts
- [USMA:29268] Re: 500 g pound Chimpsarecute
- [USMA:29273] Re: 500 g pound J. Ward
- [USMA:29274] Re: 500 g pound Bill Potts
