Recently, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Somewhere there has to be standards and rules (for spelling and
pronunciation), ...

Maybe there SHOULD be, but there doesn't HAVE TO be, and quite apparently there aren't (at least not for English language speakers, esp. Americans). The dictionary writers are not such authorities but, because there don't seem to be any others, they are frequently given that authority, unofficially, by default.

He continued:
... if not we will all be
talking and writing like hillbillies.
Some of us "hillbillies" might take exception to that remark! :-)

Regarding his statement that seemed to say he didn't think it was
important which pronunciation of "kilometre" was to be used;

I think the most fundamental reason to favor one over the other is
consistency; all other words that begin with "kilo-" are pronounced
with the emphasis on the first syllable and a long "o" sound. Some
more-or-less common examples in SI are:

kilowatt,
kilogram,
kilojoule,
kilopascal,
kilovolt and
kilohertz.

There are also examples outside of SI like:

kiloton,
kilobyte,
kilobucks,
kilocalories and
kiloparsecs.

All are pronounced with the emphasis on the first syllable with a long
"o" sound for the "o". Why should kilometer be any different?

Similarly, the "metre" part of kilometre is pronounced with a long "e"
sound for the first "e" because the metre itself and every other
multiple or submultiple of the metre is pronounced that way. This
argues against the "uh" sound in the "kil-AHM'-uh-tur pronunciation.

The fact that there is no standard setting body to proclaim this to the
general public doesn't mean we shouldn't argue that kilometre should be
pronounced "KILL'-oh-mee-tur". It just means we need to base our
argument on logical consistency rather than on some authority.

Regards,
Bill Hooper
Fernandina Beach, Florida, USA
<><><><><><><><><><><><>
Make it simple; Make it Metric
<><><><><><><><><><><><>



Reply via email to