That is not at all what the law said.  The law, the original ISTEA
legislation, forbade the federal highway admin from using federal money to
specifically fund a metric road sign project.  It did not threaten to take
away existing funds or deny future funds for any other projects.  States
were free to spend their own money on metric road sign projects.  I do not
know if this provision is still in effect or even enforced.  Ironically, it
was ISTEA that originally mandated metric project plans for FHWA funded
projects by October 2000, a requirement removed in TEA-21.

Phil

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Stephen Gallagher
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 11:19 AM
To: U.S. Metric Association
Subject: [USMA:29369] RE: Canadian metric muddle evident

(snip)

> My guess is that one state will eventually take the mantle and
> start then others will fall in line, thus making it a bottom-up approach.
> It would have to be a state like California though as California sets
trends
> for the rest of the country for things like highway construction.
> 

Something in the back of my head keeps telling me that
there was a law passed in Congress, in recent years,
which threatened to take away federal highway money from
any state which decided to convert their roads to 
metric signage.  I can't remember the exact details.

Does anyone else remember this?

Stephen

Reply via email to