Yes, you're right. That should have been kilopicohours (even more nonsensical). And, of course, KPH would be kelvinpetahenrys.
I'd like you to meet my friend -- Kelvin P Henry. Bill Potts, CMS Roseville, CA http://metric1.org [SI Navigator] >-----Original Message----- >From: John S. Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 17:32 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; U.S. Metric Association >Subject: Re: [USMA:29372] RE: Canadian metric muddle evident > > >On Tuesday 30 March 2004 10:29, Bill Potts wrote: >> The letter p is the symbol for >> the prefix, "peta," which would make kph the non-SI value, >"kilopetahours." > >I'm guessing your meant "pico?" >
