Also, I think the plural of squid is squid, not squids.  --  Jason

----- Original Message -----
From: MightyChimp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: U.S. Metric Association <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2004 1:05 PM
Subject: [USMA:29630] Re: SA - A Pocket of Near-Perfection


> SQUIDs can detect a change in this field of only 50 billionths of a
> micro-gauss (5 x 10-14 gauss), which equates to a change of the
gyroscope's
> angle of 0.0001 arcseconds.
>
> The above sentence is the epitome of ignorance.  First of all, the unit
> gauss is deprecated and magnetic flux density should be in tesla.  Second,
> the use of "billionths of a micro-gauss" is a real winner.
>
> Since 1 gauss is equivalent to 0.1 mT, then 5 x 10-14 gauss would equal 5
x
> 10-10 T or 50 nT.  It is obvious that people who provided the data
expressed
> it as 50 nT, but the author of the article in his infinite lack of wisdom
> decided to express it FFU style.  That is in a befuddled manner.  It sure
> made it clearer for me (yeah! right!).
>
> Euric
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Carter, Baron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, 2004-04-26 14:06
> Subject: [USMA:29629] SA - A Pocket of Near-Perfection
>
>
> > A Pocket of Near-Perfection.  Except for the appalling use of ifp.  Now
> > matter how times I and others have written to these folks they still let
> > this stuff through.
> >
> >
> > http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2004/26apr_gpbtech.htm?list533332
> > <http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2004/26apr_gpbtech.htm?list533332>
> >
> >
> > baron carter
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to