I will make note of the correct spoken term. When dealing with metric, I am always 
used to saying "<a metric unit> - cubed" so that is the reason I typed "meter-cubed" 
and not "cubic meter." In future postings, I will make it a point to correctly type 
cubic measurements.

METRIC ROCKS!

--
-----Thanks!-----

Cole Kingsbury
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

----------------


> Cole:
> 
> We had a discussion of "meter-cubed" shortly before you joined the list. The
> correct spoken or narrative term is "cubic meters." The symbol, m�, is
> spoken as "cubic meters."
> 
> (I typed the symbol as an m with a superscripted 3. It may or may not have
> come out that way at your end.)
> 
> Bill Potts, CMS
> Roseville, CA
> http://metric1.org [SI Navigator]
> 
> 
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 07:31
> >To: U.S. Metric Association
> >Subject: [USMA:29836] Re: Liters or cubic decimeters?
> >
> >
> >I tend to agree with Mr. Wade in using the liter over meter-cubed.
> >Although the liter is not an official base unit of SI, it is more
> >convenient to use the prefixes in regards to unit-conversion than
> >meter-cubed. The liter is also more convenient to speak of than
> >meter-cubed.
> >
> >--
> >-----Thanks!-----
> >
> >Cole Kingsbury
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >----------------
> >
> >
> >> >I don't believe anything I wrote earlier contradicted what you wrote
> >> >below. Specifically I do not believe I said that the litre is
> >> >deprecated for non-precision use. I said that I understood it to be
> >> >advisable not to use the SI prefixes with litre; for example, since
> >> >1000 L = 1 m^3, therefore the cubic metre should be used, not the
> >> >kilolitre.
> >>
> >> But this would negate one of the main advantages of the liter:
> >the fact that
> >> it follows the 'normal' linear use of prefixes.  Translating
> >milliliters into
> >> liters or back is as easy as converting between millimeters and meters.
> >>
> >> Whereas I see the need for converting to cubic meters when coherence is
> >> required (e.g. calculating densities etc), to suggest that we
> >shouldn't use
> >> milliliters (almost universally used on soda cans here) or
> >centiliters (widely
> >> used in the wine industry) would be a huge own goal.  Remember,
> >the aim is
> >> to encourage the use of the metric system.  Adopting strategies that make
> >> it more difficult are definitely counterproductive.  Liters are probably
> >> the metric units that most Americans are familiar with, thanks
> >to Coca Cola.
> >> Lets be grateful for that.
> >>
> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> Tom Wade             | EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> EuroKom              | X400:  g=tom;s=wade;o=eurokom;p=eurokom;
> >> Unit A2              |        a=eirmail400;c=ie
> >> Nutgrove Office Park | Tel:   +353 (1) 296-9696
> >> Rathfarnham          | Fax:   +353 (1) 296-9697
> >> Dublin 14            | Disclaimer:  This is not a disclaimer
> >> Ireland              | Tip:   "Friends don't let friends do Unix !"
> >>
> 

Reply via email to