> 
> I will definitely sent a letter indicating my displeasure to my
> city council representative.  Canada is officially metric, weather 
> reports are given in metric units, and children are educated in 
> metric.  There was no reason not to include metric on that sign.
> 

I received a phone call from the Ottawa city 
department responsible for deploying the water
efficiency signs that say our lawns require 1 
inch of water per week.

The representative said that when the signs
were designed it had been discussed whether
to format the signs with metric, metric/imperial,
or just imperial.  

25 mm
25 mm / 1 inch
1 inch

The second option was ruled out because the readers
would be driving past the signs, so the city wanted
to make them quick and easy to read.  She then said 
that the imperial value (1 inch) was chosen over 
the metric value because they felt that the target
audience was more familiar with inches than millimetres,
and that the majority of today's homeowners in Ottawa
were educated before metric was introduced in the late
1970s.

I expressed my opinion that if only one unit had
to be used, then it should have been the millimetre.

Further, I stated while the argument for not using
metric is because people aren't familiar with it,
they will never become familiar with it unless they use
it.

I was thanked for expressing my opinion, and that
they'd keep it in mind for future decisions.

Stephen

Reply via email to