You are just guessing, Euric. If the original rating was in horsepower, then the conversion to 99, which is close to 100, is correct and is just coincidence.

Jim


At 9 07 04, 09:17 AM, you wrote:
Why do I get the feeling the engine was designed as a 100 kW engine, then
dumb-downed and rounded to the 133 horsepowers and then back-converted and
not rounded correctly to the original, intended 100 kW?

Here is a perfect example of FFU making a muddle of figures.

Euric


Jim Elwell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
801-466-8770
www.qsicorp.com



Reply via email to