Dozens of New Crimes - The Heart's Desire of the UKMA Fanatics
July 21 2004 at 12:54 AM
Tony Bennett 

New Labour has already added hundreds of new crimes to the statute books in the last 7 years - including of course selling bananas by the pound (and various associated offences - *marking* them up at 25p per pound is a separate offence, also with a jail term or �5,000 fine as maximum sentences).

The UKMA wishes to vastly extend the number of crimes which could be committed by the British people. It is quite hard to believe, but now that I have studied the recent UKMA report: 'A Very British Mess' in depth, here are *just some* of the new crimes proposed by them:

UKMA want a law to stop people advertising their office floor space in imperial and want criminal sanctions to enforce this

UKMA want a law to stop estate agents stating how many acres of land are for sale at a property and want criminal sanctions to enforce this

UKMA want a law to stop people stating in adverts for their houses how long their garden is in feet and want criminal sanctions to enforce this

UKMA want a law to stop estate agents describing the size of rooms in a house for sale in feet and inches and want criminal sanctions to enforce this

UKMA want a law to stop people advertising pizzas for sale in inches and want criminal sanctions to enforce this

UKMA want a law to stop people buying curtain material in 48" and 54" drops and want criminal sanctions to enforce this

UKMA want a law to stop McDonalds, Burger King and other food outlets referring to 'halfpounders' and 'quarterpounders' and want criminal sanctions to enforce this

UKMA want a law to stop film companies and photo shops describing photo and picture sizes in inches and want criminal sanctions to enforce this

UKMA want a law to stop all weather forecasters and weather reporters referring to wind speeds in miles per hour, referring to visibility in miles, and to giving the Fahrenheit equivalents of Celsius temperatures and to giving the inches equivalent of rainfall in millimetres - and want criminal sanctions to enforce this (in their great mercy they stop just short of wishing to impose criminal penalties on newspapers for these same 'offences')

UKMA want a law to stop restaurants printing menus with descriptions such as '8oz. steak' and '12oz. steak' and want criminal sanctions to enforce this

UKMA want a law to stop people selling paintbrushes with their width in inches marked on them and want criminal sanctions to enforce this

UKMA want a law to stop people selling beds in feet and inches - the metric equivalent of 3', 4' 6" and 5' would have to be given - and want criminal sanctions to enforce this

UKMA want a law to stop people selling sheds in feet (e.g. 8' sheds) and want criminal sanctions to enforce this

UKMA want a law to stop people referring in adverts for cars to miles per gallon and want criminal sanctions to enforce this

UKMA want a law to stop people selling or advertising carpets per square yard and want criminal sanctions to enforce this

UKMA want a law to stop people referrig to anything imperial in any advertisement of any kind and want criminal sanctions to enforce this (thus the ads I posted a few months ago on this bulletin board would become crimes e.g. 'Jack Daniels Whisky is filtered through 10 feet of maple charcoal', 'Avoid the 50-yard dash', '634 feet of strech limo' etc.)

UKMA want a law to stop people buying televisions with screen sizes in inches and want criminal sanctions to enforce this.

And that is not by any means a full list - space and time don't permit me to compile an exhaustive list.

They also want to complete the metrication of all Britain's 1 to 2 million road signs no later than 'early 2007'.

These facts can be readily checked in the UKMA Report which is on their website. When I realised just how far they wanted to go, the word 'fanatic' sprang to mind, which is why I've put it in the title of this posting.

Anyone from UKMA who reads this mesage is hereby publicly invited to deny - on this bulletin board - any of the above statements if they think they are incorrect
 

Reply via email to