on 2004-07-28 05.00, Nat Hager III at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> I like to get news from the UK, because it is relevant to metrication in
> the US.  But geez Chimp, 20 messages in a row is a bit much.
> 
> Nat

Dear Nat and All,

While the bizarre activities in the UK, as reported by Euric, are less
relevant to the USA at present, I believe that they are a warning of
possibilities to come there.

As is obvious, the UK and the USA are at different stages in their
metrication transitions, The UK is nearly there and the USA still has a long
way to go.

To me, the activities in the UK are extremely interesting because they shed
light on to the desperation of the anti-metric people when they suddenly
realise that metrication is not only inevitable � but that it has already
happened so substantially that it is almost completed.

I think of this as 'going the final millimetre'

Let me give some examples.

Roads in the UK are designed using all metric dimensions (mm, m, and km).
The roads are then built using the same dimensions. I also understand that
there are small unobtrusive metric markers along these metric roads so that
road repair workers can easily find faults and damage � these are at 100�m,
500�m, and kilometre spacings. New bridges are also designed, built, and
maintained in metric measures. The only remaining metric changes needed are
speed signs, distance signs and bridge dimensions. When viewed from the
perspective of the metrication progress made in the UK since 1965, these
final minor changes represent 'going the final millimetre'.

All of the modern* cars on the roads in the UK are designed, built, and
maintained in metric units. The only remaining metric change needed is to
the speedometers. The odometers, and to tyre pressure gauges, Again, when
seen in historical context, this is simply the final millimetre.
* modern includes the all-metric 1934 model car designed by Ferdinand
Porsche, which most people know as the Volkswagen Beetle, and to all other
all metric cars made to the 'world car concept' since the mid-1970s.

I can also think of examples where the concept of the 'going the final
millimetre' is directly relevant in the USA. For example, in the computer
industry all design, manufacture and maintenance is done in metric units.
Then the software people set the word processor page margins in inches and
quarter inches, the tabs and indents in half inches to delude their
customers about their metrication. In short, the computer people are using
metric measures, because they are simple and easy to use, but they are not
'going the final millimetre' and informing their customers.

Let me quote from the Q&A item in last month's Metrication matters
newsletter.
Q&A
It seems that hiding metric measures is quite common in woodworking
activities in the USA. See
http://www.woodweb.com/knowledge_base/Going_metric_Pros_and_cons.html  and
then try to understand what (and why)  woodworkers are hiding their
practices from their customers. This question and answer are from the
woodweb site.
Question
What are some pros and cons of going metric? We purchased three new machines
recently, including a 'Weeke' point to point, and the question of converting
to metric keeps coming up.
Forum Response
I heartily endorse the idea of full metric production in the shop. Most
staff start out not liking it but come around quickly when they get rid of
the fractions. Our only ongoing difficulty has been that the design end of
our business must remain in imperial dimensions for customer reasons and the
conversion issues are most easily handled by the computer packages we have.
Cabnetware does a good job of letting you design in imperial and then build
in metric.

I suspect that many businesses in the USA are fully aware, and perhaps
afraid of the reaction they will get when they finally decide on 'going the
final millimetre'.

Cheers,

Pat Naughtin LCAMS
Geelong, Australia

Pat Naughtin is the editor of the free online newsletter, 'Metrication
matters'. You can subscribe by sending an email containing the words
subscribe Metrication matters to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

Reply via email to