> Of Paul Trusten, R.Ph. >Here, as pasted text, Word document, and .pdf file, >is the CALTRANS memo dealing with the proposed >reversion to non-metric units
Thank you for posting that. I was a bit cynical about the messages saying that their was a reversion. I was about to suggest that it might be just one of those things where they are forbidden to spend taxpayer money on metrication. To my horror, I see that it is taxpayer financed reversion. We have often argued that costs of change to metric can be justified if offset against long term savings. It is ironic that they are suggesting that it works in the opposite direction.
