Why does the US persist with imperial units of measurement?

First, I suspect that Americans would deny that they are imperial units. The US authorities have probably had a look at countries like Australia who have adopted the SI system and decided that it isn't worth the effort. After nearly 30 years of metrication most Australians give their height and weight in imperial units (even those born since metrication) and new-born babies are still recorded in Herald classifieds as being of weights such as 7lb 5oz. You don't have to look too hard in the newspaper to find units like inches, acres, horsepower, calories ... but don't get me started.

Gary Sullivan, Sans Souci

For the same reason (or rather lack of it) that it re-elected George W. Bush.

Rich Blackmon, Mississippi, USA

As an American I can say it is because the majority of Americans do not acknowledge the concept of a "global standard". Americans are under the impression that the "rest of the world" is an odd, quaint, confusing and sometimes hostile place that is really trying darn hard to catch up with America and do things the right way, but just sometimes these foreigners need a little help to understand how to do stuff properly. I mean, really; soccer, centimetres, public health, what are these crazy foreigners talking about.

Andrew Nelson, Earlwood

I am an 11-year-old boy and I have had a few acquaintances who are American children. Some of them are quite bright, but along with American adults they don't care what the rest of the world thinks - especially when the rest of the world is right. The rest of the world considers this ignorance. Is a metre really too far for an American?

Benjamin Mellefont, Bondi Beach

The answer is in the question itself ... and, anyway, if Belle France, originator of the metric system, cannot support the "coalition of the willing" why should "them good ole boys" measure their SUVs' fuel consumption in (mega)litres per 100 kilometres?

Matt Walsh, Hughes, ACT

 

 

Reply via email to