David King wrote: "The 0.09 cubic feet figure you quoted is slightly more than 25 litres, so I wonder if that was a rough conversion or the figure for the external volume?"
Looks like a bad case of big foot. 0.09 cu. ft. is just over 2.5 L. In fact, John had his decimal point in the wrong place and should have said 0.9 cubic feet, which is about 25.5 L. Bill Potts, CMS Roseville, CA http://metric1.org [SI Navigator]
