Apart from being crass and heartless do you think discussing the collapse of
the US economy is a discussion about metrication?
Or have you forgotton all of those posts you made as "euric"?
From: "Ametrica" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,"U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [USMA:31771] Re: More metric in periodicals
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 11:35:52 -0500
This is forum to discuss metrication. Your comments are off-topic.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Stephen Humphreys"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, 2005-01-03 10:07
Subject: [USMA:31771] Re: More metric in periodicals
I think its probably a good time to enthuse everyone here to donate money
to the charities involved in either �'s or $'s (it really doesn't matter).
Its amazing how generous people have been so far.
From: "Paul Trusten, R.Ph." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
CC: "USMA Listserver" <[email protected]>
Subject: [USMA:31763] Re: More metric in periodicals
Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 15:19:22 -0600
My heart and money go out to them, too. While the following is minor
compared to what they went through, I once had my car almost swept away
by
high water, with me in it. Two "angels" from a nearby 7-11 rescued both
car
and driver.
Sorry if the juxtaposition of measurement and sadness offended you, and I
didn't intend it to be cold. I just noticed the units in the article,
which
is still an unusual practice for the Associated Press, and had to
comment.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stephen Humphreys" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
Sent: 05 Jan 02,Sunday 10:56
Subject: [USMA:31756] Re: More metric in periodicals
> Don't you think its a bit soon to talk about that disaster in terms of
which
> measurement system is best?
>
> My heart goes out to all those who have lost loved ones - despite >
"feet"
ot
> "metres".
>
> It could not have come at a worse time of year - enough to stretch any
form
> of faith.
>
> >From: "Paul Trusten, R.Ph." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
> >Subject: [USMA:31748] Re: More metric in periodicals
> >Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 15:47:56 -0600
> >
> >AP articles on the tsunami crisis reported quantities in metric units
> >first,
> >with pre-metric units in parentheses. .
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
> >Sent: 05 Jan 01,Saturday 15:36
> >Subject: [USMA:31746] More metric in periodicals
> >
> >
> > > I am starting to see, on a regular basis, metric measurements used
> > > in periodicals, with no translation to colloquial units. I've > >
> posted
> > > several from Men's Health magazine over the last couple of years.
> > >
> > > Two recent examples from different magazines:
> > >
> > >
> > > Fine Gardening, February 2005, page 19 (spotted by my wife, who is
> > > the gardener in the family):
> > >
> > > "Earthworms can process around 0.08 to 0.3 grams of soil in one >
> > day,
> > > depending on the species."
> > >
> > > Forbes, 10 January 2005, page 169:
> > >
> > >
> > > "A six-course white truffle tasting menu being offered in New York
> > > by chef Alain Ducasse contains in toto 20 grams of truffle."
> > >
> > > I find the second one most interesting, since it is cold, hard, >
> > cash
> > > versus a certain amount of a very expensive food, and the amount
is
> > > in grams only.
> > >
> > > Jim Elwell
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.298 / Virus Database: 265.6.7 - Release Date: 2004-12-30
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.298 / Virus Database: 265.6.7 - Release Date: 2004-12-30
