It's easier to accept if you regard the rules regarding spelled-out unit
names and unit symbols as the grammar of SI.

I don't think the participants in the quadrennial CGPM (Conf�rence G�n�rale
des Poids et Mesures) want to bully anyone. However, in order to have SI
units universally understood, the definitions need to be prescriptive (as in
a specification), not descriptive (as in a dictionary).

Bill Potts, CMS
Roseville, CA
http://metric1.org [SI Navigator]


>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Behalf Of ewc
>Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 02:20
>To: U.S. Metric Association
>Subject: [USMA:31876] Re: "UK measures"/FFU's
>
>
>Hi Bill
>
>First just to say that is a really well built (& useful) web site you
>have on metric units - certainly the bits I have looked at anyhow.
>
>You write:
>
><<The trouble with an abbreviation, such as gms, is that, according to
>the  rules regarding SI symbols, it can be mistaken for the
>non-existent unit, gram meter second. That may not usually be a
>problem for humans, but could  be a problem for software used to scan
>specifications in>>
>
>I honestly have a big problem about being told to do things just for
>the benefit of a small special interest group.  I really do fear that
>it is often done mainly to gratify a basic desire to bully others
>(bullying for its own sake).
>
><<Some entities (e.g., the Gulf States Cooperation Council) have very
>rigorous rules regarding the use of SI in specification documents.>>
>
>I am inclined to think that the fact that the Gulf states are not
>democracies has a bearing on this matter.
>
>The reason I raised Einstein was that he got expelled from school for
>comments like the one I quoted - and then failed to get a job as a
>lecturer for roughly the same reason.  In a rational society contracts
>should surely go to innovative, efficient and inexpensive tenderers.
>Human nature being what it is they may well turn out to be the kind of
>people who find excessive rule following unbearably irksome
>
>Seems no one out there knows anything about the history of the US ton?
>If so it kind of vindicates my comments on Homer Simpson I feel (a
>comment not aimed at Jim - but at everybody who uses  'FFU')
>
>best
>
>rob
>
>(Robert Tye, York, UK)
>
>

Reply via email to