Unfortunately too many people equate the EU with metrication in the UK, which is a shame because metrication should have been completed long before the EU existed. Other British Commonwealth countries became metric and are still metric, without any intervention from the EEC, EC or EU or Europe in general. I think that in the UK, resistance to metric does sometimes come from a view that metric is European, not British, and therefore, to remain British, we must avoid lots of European things like metric.

I think that if the EU wanted us all to use imperial then the UK would be a lot more metric, simply because too many British people oppose anything they see as being "European", regardless of its merits or usage outside of Europe.

In regards to leaving the EU, maybe the UK should leave, but whether it is a part of the EU or not, the UK would be better off being solely metric. There is no reason to have a choice of two systems, as it can lead to confusion, higher costs and disharmony. Choice is an illusion anyway, none of us really have much choice in anything. We make choices based on a limited number of choices available and often regret those choices later. And choice can be manipulated by those in power very easily, otherwise advertising would not exist.

David


Stephen Humphreys wrote:


Personally I am very anti-EU and would like the UK out of the EU on both social, economic, political *AND* sovereignty issues. As far as delusions of empire even my only living grand-mother isn't old enough to remember such a thing. However, I am proud of the commonwealth - but not for reasons of "harking back to the empire", regardless of both the good and bad things empire brought with it. P.S. I'm Welsh (just in case you'd want to know! :-) )









Reply via email to