>Like most traditional measures, �sd was a sophisticated system >constructed to enable mathematically adept people (using precious >metal currency) to make quick calculations and estimates in their >heads.
ROTLF. It *required* an unnecessary level of adeptness to make mental calculations. A decimal based system requires less because the conversion factors are in tune with the base of the number system used. Perhaps it was more suited to Roman numerals ? >You would be correct to point out that it is not a good system >for a mathematical incompetent who owns a pocket calculator (and uses >bits of paper as money.) Jumping through hoops is not easy for people who are not fit. That doesn't mean it's a good idea to make able-bodied people do it as well. ><<Hats off to the Americans for inventing decimal currency.>> > >I guess you must have been dipping into the Homer Simpson 'big book of >facts' for this one? No, it was a British TV quiz show (Mastermind) I think that I first heard this stated some years ago. I also found it at http://www.secretservice.gov/money_history.shtml but I accept that this would not be an impartial source. By all means enlighten us if you know differently. I am quite happy to change a traditional point of view in the face of something better (which is what this whole topic is about). ----------------------------------------------------------------- Tom Wade | EMail: tee dot wade at eurokom dot ie EuroKom | Tel: +353 (1) 296-9696 A2, Nutgrove Office Park | Fax: +353 (1) 296-9697 Rathfarnham | Disclaimer: This is not a disclaimer Dublin 14 | Tip: "Friends don't let friends do Unix !" Ireland
