If it had normal body temp marked as 38 �C then it was not a good thermometer. The actual correct normal human body temp is 36.8 �C.

David King

** Get Fast Broadband from �14.99
** http://tinyurl.com/5y7mf


Excellent web hosting and email
http://www.1and1.co.uk/?k_id=3899401

Buy UKMA's report "A Very British Mess" ISBN 0750310146
http://bookmark.iop.org/bookpge.htm?&isbn=0750310146



Paul Trusten wrote:

One of the doctors at hospital where I am employed orders Tylenol for fever as follows: " . . .every four hours as needed for temperature over 38." He is the only physician at my institution who orders medication based on Celsius body temperature. Since our nurses lack familiarity with Celsius, and apparently have no Celsius fever thermometers, they sometimes call down to the pharmacy to ask what the equivalent is in Fahrenheit. Curious to see if Celsius had made inroads in popular fever thermometers, I checked my local Walgreens last night and found two Celsius-capable devices, one analog, the other digital.
The analog one, imported from Germany by RG Medical Diagnostics of Southfield, Michigan (www.rgmd.com <http://www.rgmd.com>) was interesting, in that it contained what was described as a mercury substitute. It had a dual Celsius-Fahrenheit scale, with the "normal" body temperature marked on the scales in red (38 C, 98.6 F). The analog thermometer was $10, and the digital one was $12.
The digital thermometer that had Celsius was a Becton-Dickinson (B-D) Rapid Flex, which could be set to read out in either Celsius or Fahrenheit.
Paul Trusten, R.Ph.
Editor, "Metric Today"
3609 Caldera Blvd., Apt. 122
Midland TX 79707-2872 USA



Reply via email to