Thanks for the link to this article. It's interesting that Rachel Metz chose to define the kilogram in terms of the archaic 'pound'. I quote: 'If several scientists get their way, a 2.2-pound hunk of metal -- the international prototype of the kilogram -- may soon be out of style'.
Does this shows where her mindset is at?
Cheers,
Pat Naughtin
Geelong, Australia
61 3 5241 2008
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.metricationmatters.com
on 2005-03-03 23.57, Nat Hager III at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting article on kilogram redefinition....
http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,66727,00.html
Nat
