|
Unless I need precision, I think of an inch as 25 mm, a foot as 30 cm, translate a yard to a meter and think of a mile as 1600 m.� For weight, � lb is 125 g, � lb is 250 g, etc.� Volume, a cup is 240 to 250 ml and a pint becomes 500 ml (or � liter in colloquial terms).
Interestingly, when thinking of a mile as 1600 m, it gives the nice divisible numbers (400, 800, 1200) for �, � and � mile that you don’t get with dividing 5280 feet.� Isn’t that one of the arguments about why numbers like 12 inches and 16 oz are supposed to be much easier? J
Phil From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hillger, Don
Nor do I! Then we would still have a layer of unit names that would mask the simplicity of the metric system.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Hooper
On 2005 Apr 13 , at 12:33 PM, John Nichols wrote:
I don't think that would have helped anything at all.
Regards, Bill Hooper Fernandina Beach, Florida, USA ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Go Metric America! Or get left behind! ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |
- [USMA:32694] Re: UK Public Servant Phil Chernack
- [USMA:32695] Divisibility (was UK Public Servant) Bill Potts
- [USMA:32696] Re: UK Public Servant Philip S Hall
- [USMA:32697] Re: UK Public Servant Bill Hooper
- [USMA:32698] Re: UK Public Servant Pierre Abbat
- [USMA:32700] Re: UK Public Servant Bill Hooper
- [USMA:32699] Re: UK Public Servant Phil Chernack
- [USMA:32701] Re: UK Public Servant Stephen Humphreys
- [USMA:32702] Re: UK Public Servant Nat Hager III
