Before I responded, I wanted to check out the site you listed below.

The first thing to jump out at me was the statement:

May 2005 marks exactly four decades since Parliament announced its plan for Britain to adopt the metric system over a ten year period.

When the President of the Board of Trade stood up in the House of Commons on 24 May 1965 to announce that Britain would be going metric over the following decade....

When I connect it with the first paragraph of the synopsis below I see an important connection. Metrication was brought about not by government, but by the request of industry to the government. The industries, according to the synopsis did convert and most likely aren't experiencing any "mess". The mess results when neither industry or government involved the population in the form of training and working with the change, thus the population still thinks in English units and not metric.

The education may be metric, but that is more to suit the needs of industry then to create a metric attitude in the minds of the people. Without education in metric industry would be responsible for the training at a cost to them.

In viewing the site, I came across something of interest I thought must create must errors and frustration. By going to the page on Kitchen Planning, I can see where a big mess can result. Homes and Kitchens are built to rounded metric sizes as are the appliances designed to fit into certain spaces. Yet, when doing rennovating people use an inch tape measure. Somehow measuring in units that don't relate to the way things are made or designed to fit has to create errors that result in a cost to someone. I would think it is the consumer who pays the cost for any errors. That alone should be a reason for the public to adopt solely metric. Yet it doesn't seem to bother the consumer that he must pay for his mistakes. The store surely isn't. Maybe the store benefits when someone has to come back and buy the correct size the second time. The mess may be a problem for some but a profit for others. If the group that is most affected by the mess doesn't seem to mind wasting money then what can really be done to clean up the mess?

Those who don't want to lose money can save themselves any loss by using metric completely and I'm sure some do.

What does the UKMA plan to do to correct what they see as a muddle? Do they have a plan of action or are they all talk?

Dan


----- Original Message ----- From: Bill Potts
To: U.S. Metric Association
Sent: Wednesday, 2005-05-25 04:26
Subject: [USMA:32896] Re: Metric in federal legislation


Daniel Jackson wrote:
What is the UKMA and what do they mean by "A Very British Mess"?
What kind of mess is Britain in?

A simple Google search would reveal it for you. However, it's United Kingdom Metric Association.
Here's the synopsis from their website at http://ukma.org.uk.

Synopsis
British weights and measures are in a mess. This is because although many aspects of national life are metric (including most industry and building, school mathematics and science, athletics, rugby union and Ordnance Survey maps), many imperial relics remain (e.g. in road signs, football commentaries, estate agents' advertisements and most non-specialist media). The result is a confusing muddle. This half metric, half imperial muddle matters. It matters because it increases costs (dual pricing and marking of packages), prevents fair comparisons in shops, requires constant conversions, leads to misunderstandings, wastes our children's metric education, confuses overseas visitors, and, not least, frustrates one of the great advantages of metric units - that they constitute a proper coherent system in which all units are interrelated and easy to calculate in. We are in this mess because successive British governments lacked the commitment and political courage to carry through a necessary reform in a decisive and co-ordinated manner. Instead they have lapsed into a piecemeal, "voluntary/gradual" approach without attempting to explain the reasons for change or to win hearts and minds. The result has been that opponents of change have been able to exploit fears of the unknown and misrepresent metrication as though it were a foreign imposition. The reform has therefore stalled.
UK Metric Association (UKMA) contends that there is a way out of this mess.
The purpose of this report by the UKMA is to persuade responsible opinion formers that the UK should complete the changeover to exclusive use of the international metric system as soon as practicable. The UK is the only significant country in the world (apart from the USA) which has begun and then failed to carry through a metric conversion programme. UKMA calls upon the Government to demonstrate its commitment by announcing early completion dates for all remaining areas of national life, including retailing and road signs
Bill Potts, CMS
Roseville, CA
http://metric1.org [SI Navigator]







No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.322 / Virus Database: 266.11.16 - Release Date: 2005-05-24

Reply via email to