No, but you appeared to be suffciently concerned about it's existence to
contempate vandalising private property. What right have you to do this,
especially as you insist that the sign is of little consequence to the
community?
I have never or never will (be bothered to) change signs that I don't
like.
Whether it be via vandalism or correction (depending on viewpoint).
You appear to have missed out on my dark sense of humour, under which that
post was made (in 2002!!).
Can I take it then that you disapprove of the actions of the sign
"correctors" and are prepared to dissociate yourself from them?
Can I also take it that these (more recent) incidents were a joke too?
www.network54.com/Forum/thread?forumid=101360&messageid=1056972633&lp=1103062519
www.network54.com/Forum/thread?forumid=101360&messageid=1116005059&lp=1116190499
www.network54.com/Forum/thread?forumid=101360&messageid=1100175752&lp=1101817072
Or maybe this forum should dismiss your messages entirely as not being
serious or worthy of response.
If you take a look around that site you'll see some cracking humour -
especially between moderate pro-metric's, moderate pro-imps and
pro-choicers.
It only got a bit nasty when "euric" posted there (he later became
"Erin"). But just like this site he has now been banned.
(But I'm sure you'll already know that, and "all about me" from an email
he sent you.)
He may have put me on the scent but the evidence speaks for itself.
Phil Hall
