Bill & friends:
One of the main obstacles is
the perception that metric is something 'foreign' being pushed on them.
Generation of discussion of the 'spellings for Metre & Litre' has led to avoidable flow of filling INBOX and 'time investment' in reading mail responses. However, interesting..... My point here is: 'What is Metric and how do we differentiate *metric from decimal*'? Here is my view that I have insisted for almost 35 years: The METRE was divided into parts of 'ten', and those further into 'ten' times smaller or larger. The 'metric system' is often confused with the decimal notation: "Metric, pertaining to or of the metre; -system, decimal measuring system with the metre, & litre and the gram determined by it, as the units of length, capacity and weight; the prefixing to the metre etc., of the Greek derived 'deca-, hecto-, kilo-' denoting multiplication by 10, 100, 1000 as in kilometre of 1000 metres; that of Latin derived 'deci-, centi-, milli-, denoting division by 10, 100, 1000 as in decilitre, one-tenth of a litre". It is, therefore, to be understood that any quantity that is decimally divided or multiplied is ONLY decimal; and it can be classified into the Metric domain – if and only if this is also linked to the length Unit METRE, to belong to the SI Metric System of Units.
Brij Bhushan Vij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(Kali5106-W23-04)/D-265+1 (Friday)2005 Sept.23H0594(decimal) IST
Aa Nau Bhadra Kritvo Yantu Vishwatah -Rg Veda
Jan:31; Feb:29; Mar:31; Apr:30; May:31; Jun:30
Jul:30; Aug:31; Sep:30; Oct:31; Nov:30; Dec:30
(365th day of Year is World Day)
******As per Kali V-GRhymeCalendar******
Telephone: +91-11-25590335

From: "Bill Potts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
Subject: [USMA:34608] Re: spelling
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 10:47:02 -0700

Good translations, except for one.

Fender is not American for bumper, but for wing. Bumper is bumper in both
versions of English.

I used to make the same mistake many years ago, when I still lived in
England. We had a fender around our fireplace, which looked very much like a
car's bumper, so I assumed the American term "fender"  referred to what we
called the bumper. It was only after I emigrated to Canada (in 1957) that I
discovered my error.

Bill Potts, CMS
Roseville, CA
http://metric1.org [SI Navigator]


>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Behalf Of Tom Wade VMS Systems
>Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 02:24
>To: U.S. Metric Association
>Subject: [USMA:34604] Re: spelling
>
>
>
>>My point was not that I am advocating that all Americans should change to
>>the 'metre' spelling but rather the use of two different
>spellings comes to
>>us all at a considerable cost.
>
>But is this cost really necessary ?  The most important point about the
>differences between American and British spelling is that the words are
>still mutually intelligible.  We can see the spelling differences, but we
>know exactly what is being meant. In all the discussion forums I take part
>in which contain a mix of English speaking Americans & non-Americans, I
>have never seen a case where spelling causing confusion (apart from the
>occasional idiot who will try to insist that one is 'right' and the other
>'wrong').
>
>A far greater impediment is where totally different words are used, e.g.
>car parts trunk [boot], hood [bonnet], muffler [silencer], fender [bumper],
>or where the same word means something entirely different e.g. biscuit,
>chips.  This has by far the potential to cause genuine confusion, and
>requires much more editorial effort to protect against.  In comparison,
>trying to standardize (or even standardise) on spelling would make little
>or no difference.
>
>As for the metric issue, the spelling and  pronunciation of the unit
>words (not the symbols) vary between languages and dialects.  Thus if
>confusion is to be avoided, the symbols should be used in articles rather
>than the names.
>
>Finally, the object of this group is to promote the greater use of
>metric worldwide, particularly in the US.  One of the main obstacles is
>the perception that metric is something 'foreign' being pushed on them.
>Trying to push British or French spelling conventions on metric units
>will simply reinforce this perception, and make metric conversion
>harder.
>
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_and_British_English_differences
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>Tom Wade                     | EMail: tee dot wade at eurokom dot ie
>EuroKom                  | Tel:   +353 (1) 296-9696
>A2, Nutgrove Office Park | Fax:   +353 (1) 296-9697
>Rathfarnham              | Disclaimer:  This is not a disclaimer
>Dublin 14                | Tip:   "Friends don't let friends do Unix !"
>Ireland
>


Reply via email to