Hmmm
Thanks, Jim, for the advice.
And I know you're correct, and recognise that, after checking, the low
number of responses he gets indicates a slight "ignore" feature to his
efforts.
Similarly on the BWMA forums - he posts the "fact" that because the UK is
seeing slowed growth for the moment that means he can re-define growth to
"Massive Recession" (I kid you not, it's there for all to see). Naturally,
this and all other posts about the Euro, how the UK works and the collapse
of the US tends to be ignored there too. It used to be Iraq oil under
saddam but now it's Iranian oil that's the highlight of the measurement
debate - WHO CARES?
From: Jim Elwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
Subject: [USMA:34803] RE: Vulgar
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 09:39:50 -0600
At 11 10 05, 02:25 AM, Stephen Humphreys wrote:
Once again you've helped all those people who are considering a switch to
metric from imperial, or are simply "in the middle" to make a positive
choice.
If you insult people enough who don't share your opinion - sooner or later
they will submit to you and share your opinion.
I wonder how succesful you have been, Daniel, in promoting the metric
system in your own unique way?
You're wasting keystrokes, Stephen. Daniel is one of the "anointed" who
knows what is best for everyone else, and likes to lord it over everyone.
And, of course, he has managed to convert hordes of the vulgar people to
the metric system with his superior wisdom and insight.
Well, at least in his own little mind.
Jim
P.S. Odd how he refuses to tell anyone of anything he has ever actually
done to promote metrication. I wonder why that is?
Jim Elwell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
801-466-8770
www.qsicorp.com
