|
Hmmmm, in thinking about Ken Butcher's remarks
about what's happening with the FPLA amendment and FMI's opposition to it, it
certainly looks more and more like those who claim that the US is just stalling
when it comes to providing metric-only labelling to the EU are right. If the US
were serious about taking the time provided by the extension to prepare for
metric-only labelling, there would be more than enough support to pass an
amendment to the FPLA to allow for voluntary metric-only labelling.
If the EU really means to stand firm this time and
not extend the deadline (again!) when it arrives in 2009, then this could be
leverage to convince folks who are neutral (as most apparently are according to
Ken) to switch to active support of the amendment so that they can stock a
single inventory of goods with metric-only labelling. It might also provide
ammunition to try and turn the FMI around on this issue.
Of course, if folks like the FMI are betting that
the EU will cave in yet again, well, they won't find the argument about the
looming deadline very persuasive.
Perhaps there are folks involved with the USMA who
have contacts they can use to sound out whether the Europeans are serious about
holding the line this time? And that this information could be communicated
appropriately to sway stakeholders to support the amendment?
Ezra
|
- [USMA:34868] FMI and 2009 EU deadline Ezra Steinberg
- [USMA:34869] Re: FMI and 2009 EU deadline Scott Hudnall
