Philip S Hall wrote:

"Steven Davies

"I think you misunderstood me. I was criticising Herron for his hypocrisy not 
you.

"I suggest you re-read my message."

Yes - many apologies for my total misunderstanding of you.  Not for the first 
time, I feel like a prize chump!

Thanks for putting me right!

Yours rather sheepishly,

Steve.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Philip S Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Stephen Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "U.S. Metric Association" 
<[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 9:31 PM
Subject: Re: [USMA:35146] Re: The pitfalls of double conversion.


> Steven Davies
> 
> I think you misunderstood me. I was criticising Herron for his hypocrisy not 
> you.
> 
> I suggest you re-read my message.
> 
> Stephen Humphreys
> 
> Neil Herron (according to what was said here) compained to Sunderland 
> Council about the sign.
> 
> Phil Hall
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Stephen Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 8:44 PM
> Subject: [USMA:35146] Re: The pitfalls of double conversion.
> 
> 
> > Philip S. Hall wrote:
> >
> > "Neil Herron is a classic example of what I was talking about. He runs the
> > metric martyrs campaign which ostensibly is about protecting the freedom 
> > of
> > marketeers from the law requiring them to sell in metric. He (like they 
> > all
> > do) says he's not anti-metric."
> >
> > Well No.1, the Metric Martyrs campaign is effectively over as he tried 
> > three times to overturn the law and he was three times unsuccessful and 
> > No.2, if we was indeed not "anti-metric", much of his campaign, much of 
> > which involved ridiculing metric measurements was certainly a strange way 
> > of showing it.  Traders in the UK have had to obey weights and measures 
> > law for the past 200 years.  Why did Neil Herron only object to the law 
> > when metric measurements only were introduced?
> >
> > Anyway, the Metric Martyrs are old news now.  I only mentioned Neil Herron 
> > in passing regarding his contribution towards having that signpost you 
> > mention changed, nothing more.
> >
> > "So what have distance signs got to do with it? What does it matter if a 
> > sign
> > says its 500 m to the village of Bourdon?"
> >
> > Well, in the great scheme of things, nothing I suppose.  You're not 
> > interested but a couple of people on the forum expressed mild interest 
> > about how a 30 year old signpost reading 0.5km was replaced by one reading 
> > 300 yards which was actually revised to 500 yards very recently.  The 
> > question being; how come the new sign is so out of whack compared to the 
> > old one?  A good demonstration of the pitfalls of conversion, I thought. 
> > Obviously you didn't.
> >
> > "Where are those "I'm not
> > anti-metric" principles?"
> >
> > I'm not entirely sure what you mean by this.  How does talking about a 500 
> > metre sign make me anti-metric?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Philip S Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Stephen Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "U.S. Metric 
> > Association" <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 8:16 PM
> > Subject: Re: [USMA:35142] Re: The pitfalls of double conversion.
> >
> >
> >> > Apologies for not replying earlier, Daniel.  Neil Herron may well be a
> >> > member of ARM but if he is, he's certainly keeping it a secret as I'm
> >> > certainly not aware if he is or not.
> >> >
> >> > He seems more concerned with scoring petty points off Sunderland 
> >> > council
> >> > nowadays.
> >>
> >> Neil Herron is a classic example of what I was talking about. He runs the
> >> metric martyrs campaign which ostensibly is about protecting the freedom 
> >> of
> >> marketeers from the law requiring them to sell in metric. He (like they 
> >> all
> >> do) says he's not anti-metric.
> >>
> >> So what have distance signs got to do with it? What does it matter if a 
> >> sign
> >> says its 500 m to the village of Bourdon? Where are those "I'm not
> >> anti-metric" principles?
> >>
> >> Phil Hall
> >>
> >>
> >
> > 
> 
> 

Reply via email to