On Sunday 11 December 2005 23:02, Pat Naughtin wrote: > Probably the best way of describing shoe sizes is with the Mondopoint > system. This uses foot length in millimetres and foot width in millimetres, > both of which are rounded to the next highest 0 or 5 ending, and in your > case this would be written as 'Mondopoint 260/95'.
Um, my *foot* is 220/95; the 22 cm shoe is apparently something like 220/80, but since the box didn't list the width I was lost. Whom do we go after for implementing Mondopoint? The present mishmash of sizes is bewildering. If a shoemaker makes shoes that aren't designed for Mondopoint sizes, and describes them in Mondopoint, would they use numbers that aren't multiples of 5? phma
