I don't understand. Are you proposing to redefine the metre as an angle
instead of a length? How can that work? It is not even the same concept.
Brij Bhushan Vij wrote:
The yard did not become more accurate, it changed slightly. the
yard is not
defined as 0.9144 m, but rather as 0.9144 m EXACTLY. This means that it
changed from 0.91443992 m to 0.9144000000 m.
I have missed checking my INBOX for some time. Reverting from Metre to
Yard may switch to disater. My providing a new defionition for Metre
New (m') as: 1/10^5th of the DEGREE (Pi/180) has the potential to
settle dust over the issue by choosing if we wish to call Metre New
(m') and re-term it as New Yard (yd').
Will this blow Le Systeme Internationale d'Unites (SI) to winds?
Regards,
Brij Bhushan Vij
(Saturday, Kali 5106-W40-06)/D-023 (Monday, 2006 January
23H17:01(decimal) ET
Aa Nau Bhadra Kritvo Yantu Vishwatah -Rg Veda
Jan:31; Feb:29; Mar:31; Apr:30; May:31; Jun:30
Jul:30; Aug:31; Sep:30; Oct:31; Nov:30; Dec:30
(365th day of Year is World Day)
******As per Kali V-GRhymeCalendar******
2108 Henry Court, MAHWAH NJ 07430 (USA)
Telephone: +001(201)684-0191
