Not really, just think of m/s as little over third of your km/h value.
Linda
----Original Message Follows----
From: "Carleton MacDonald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
Subject: [USMA:35856] RE: Weatherbug
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 22:07:06 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from eagle.colostate.edu ([129.82.100.90]) by
bay0-mc1-f6.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Wed, 25
Jan 2006 19:12:40 -0800
Received: from yuma.acns.ColoState.EDU (yuma.acns.colostate.edu
[129.82.100.64])by eagle.colostate.edu (AIX5.1/8.11.6p2/8.11.0) with ESMTP
id k0Q39x4895512;Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:09:59 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])by yuma.ACNS.ColoState.EDU
(AIX5.1/8.11.6p2/8.11.0) with SMTP id k0Q37H0100230;Wed, 25 Jan 2006
20:07:17 -0700
Received: from erie.colostate.edu (erie.acns.colostate.edu
[129.82.100.38])by yuma.acns.ColoState.EDU (AIX5.1/8.11.6p2/8.11.0) with
ESMTP id k0Q37Fe234888for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 25 Jan 2006
20:07:16 -0700
Received: from eagle.colostate.edu (eagle.acns.colostate.edu
[129.82.100.90])by erie.colostate.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id
k0Q37F5u016549for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:07:15
-0700
Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net (rwcrmhc11.comcast.net
[204.127.198.35])by eagle.colostate.edu (AIX5.1/8.11.6p2/8.11.0) with ESMTP
id k0Q37E4720632for <[email protected]>; Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:07:14 -0700
Received: from dell8400
(pcp09495808pcs.nrockv01.md.comcast.net[69.140.96.121]) by
comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with SMTP id <20060126030713m1100od9tfe>;
Thu, 26 Jan 2006 03:07:14 +0000
X-Message-Info: KtxBqYfPyq1/DCeV87Suh1+t6EzQTqzcYIxvR3u8GW4=
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670
Thread-Index: AcYiIppSD7h4KIpxS5GNh4SuEAymkQAAubfA
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlx=0
adultscore=0 adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=3.1.0-06011904
definitions=3.0.0-06012508
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.09/991022/14:20 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jan 2006 03:12:41.0042 (UTC)
FILETIME=[5E280320:01C62226]
True. 600 km to destination, and I'm going 100 km/h. Six hours.
Change the speed to meters per second, and the mental calculation becomes
almost impossible.
Carleton
_____
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Bill Hooper
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 21:41
To: U.S. Metric Association
Subject: [USMA:35854] RE: Weatherbug
On 2006 Jan 24 , at 9:29 AM, Jon Saxton wrote:
The whole km/h vs m/s debate ... makes me wonder how we got stuck with
speeds measured on an hourly basis. ... Any thoughts?
The only speed measurements familiar to many people is the speeds at which
they drive their automobiles. They measure those speeds in miles per hour or
in kilometres per hour because they relate distances driven to time measured
on a clock, predominately in hours.
Thus, I think they just are familiar with mph or km/h and usually don't
think in terms of metres per second or feet per second or anything else.
Regards,
Bill Hooper
Fernandina Beach, Florida, USA
========================
SIMPLIFICATION begins with SI
========================
_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
