That's always been my hunch.  I've learned to spot the hidden metric in American news reports by listening for the word "about" that precedes any of the USC measures.  The telltale "about 6 miles" or "about 30 feet" is a dead giveaway.  In a way I feel sorry for the US news organizations having to go to all this trouble. 

On 3/30/06, Stephen Gallagher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> As an aside, as the reports on the capture Charles
> Taylor in Africa were
> coming in, it was reported that he was apprehended
> 600 miles from the
> location of his house arrest.  This morning on NPR,
> a foreign correspondent
> got the miles and kilometers confused, and reported
> the obvious 1000 km as
> 1000 miles.  So much for accuracy in the media.

Whenever I hear US news reports about activities
taking place abroad, I wonder whenever the reported
mentions that something took place:

"About 2/3 of a mile from this location" or
"Just under 3/4 of a mile from here" or
"100 yards away."

Are those distances that they determined themselves,
or are are they taking 1 km and 100 m distances,
reported by foreign news agencies, and dumbing them
down.  I would suspect the latter.


Reply via email to