A recent article in The Washington Post about house remodeling noted the
large amount of waste that results.

I remember a few months ago an article on this list noted that when
construction is metricated there is very little waste.

Could someone point me to it?  I'd like to educate The Post a bit.

Thanks

Carleton

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Pat Naughtin
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 22:23
To: U.S. Metric Association
Subject: [USMA:36536] Re: Contractors resisting metrication (was April 1)

On 11/04/06 9:31 AM, "Pierre Abbat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Monday 10 April 2006 14:04, Martin Vlietstra wrote:
>> A four by two become 100 by 50 - at any rate it did in the UK.
> 
> The actual size is pretty close to 40 by 90. It's 100 by 50 before it's
> milled.
> 
> phma


Dear Pierre, Martin and All,

The construction industry in Australia used the opportunity of metrication
to re-engineer almost all housing dimensions including the materials that
were used and their descriptions.

For timber, this meant that the quality (such as number and placement of
knots) was monitored much more closely and the compressive strength, for
example, was much more predictable. As part of this process timber sizes
were specified to the nearest millimetre and professionals have learned that
this is fairly reliable. Some amateurs are still talking '2 by 4' or '4 by
2' for things that now measure almost exactly 90 mm by 40 mm.

One of the things that I admired in this process was the re-engineering of
houses so that wall studs were no longer placed at 18 inch (457 mm) centres
but at 600 mm centres so that the standard sheeting materials of 1200 mm by
2400 mm could be fitted more easily with major reductions in waste ‹ both in
materials and in time taken to measure, cut, and fix them.

Cheers,

Pat Naughtin
PO Box 305 Belmont 3216
Geelong, Australia
61 3 5241 2008
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.metricationmatters.com

This email and its attachments are for the sole use of the addressee and may
contain information that is confidential and/or legally privileged. This
email and its attachments are subject to copyright and should not be partly
or wholly reproduced without the consent of the copyright owner. Any
unauthorised use of disclosure of this email or its attachments is
prohibited. If you receive this email in error, please immediately delete it
from your system and notify the sender by return email.




Reply via email to