It seems the real easy way to do is in terms of the 1/2 liter bottle.  The
1/2 liter bottle has become fairly ubiquitous so why not?  "Drink the
equivalent of 4 1/2 liter bottles of water a day."  It seems simple enough
to me.

Phil

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Linda D. Bergeron
> Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 6:50 PM
> To: U.S. Metric Association
> Subject: [USMA:37176] RE: a glass of water
> 
> I agree that ..."2 lliters of water..." is the best way to say something
> like this, but many public health publications still use Fred Flintstone
> Units. Hince the opening for confusion. We will have to continue dealing
> with this confusion until the US does the right thing by requiring all
> public health and safety information to be in SI.
> 
> This will also be a great way to get the public used to thinking in terms
> of
> the SI and thus encourage them to use it in their own lives.
> 
> Linda
> 
> 
> ----Original Message Follows----
> From: "Paul Trusten, R.Ph." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
> CC: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
> Subject: [USMA:37168] RE: a glass of water
> Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 21:40:03 -0500
> 
> Great exchange of ideas, Linda and Phil. I vote for just plain two liters
> of
> water per day, or two one-liter bottles of water. This is a *reproducible*
> measurement of daily water intake, whereas, according to the manufacturers
> of
> those two drinking vessels sold at Walgreens, the daily quota of water
> becomes
> uncertain, and varies as much as 2200-1890 = 310 mL. This is why the whole
> bunch of us here are in quest of a true standard of measurement for the
> United
> States. Too often in U.S. culture, we talk about measurement, but never
> quite
> get around to doing it well.
> 
> Quoting "Linda D. Bergeron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 
>  > While growing up in Northern Virginia, I was raised with the
> understanding
>  > that a "glass" was "8 fluid ounces...", in other words "one cup". Which
> is
>  > in line with Phil's statement.
>  >
>  > Linda
>  >
>  > ----Original Message Follows----
>  > From: "Phil Chernack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
>  > Subject: [USMA:37162] RE: a glass of water
>  > Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 18:46:05 -0400
>  >
>  > Truth of the fact is that you should have around 2 L of fluid per day.
> It
>  > is, as you say a guideline.  The fluid can come in whatever form you
> want
>  > from your morning cup of coffee to the afternoon bottle of water.
> "Glasses"
>  > generally refers to around 250 mL.
>  >
>  > Phil
>  >
>  >  > -----Original Message-----
>  >  > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>  > Behalf
>  >  > Of Paul Trusten, R.Ph.
>  >  > Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 6:22 PM
>  >  > To: U.S. Metric Association
>  >  > Subject: [USMA:37161] a glass of water
>  >  >
>  >  > Putting aside the value of drinking 8 "glasses" of water a day, it
> seems
>  >  > that the makers of those large plastic driinking water containers we
>  >  > health-minded people use don't know exactly what a "glass" is.  I
> suppose
>  >  > that,generally, a "glass" in the U.S. is one U.S. cup of 240 mL.
> But,
>  > this
>  >  > afternoon at a local Walgreens, I found two different drinking cup
>  >  > products
>  >  > in an end cap basket full of them. One type was made in Chino,
>  > California,
>  >  > USA, and was labeled "64 oz" (sic) and "1.89 L." The other, country
> of
>  >  > origin unclear, was labeled "2.2 L (74 oz)."  The labels on each
> stated
>  >  > that
>  >  > each contained the recommended 8 glasses of water people should
> drink
> per
>  >  > day. On that basis, the former container yields a 236 mL "glass,"
> while
>  >  > the
>  >  > latter yields a 275 mL "glass."
>  >  >
>  >  > I suppose these products are designed only for approximate
> measurement,
>  >  > but
>  >  > when it comes down to cases, the measurement is sloppy, with an
> inexact
>  >  > term, "glass." We also have the term "ounce" once again misused,
> since
>  >  > "ounce" refers to weight, not volume (fluid ounce).
>  >  >
>  >  > It seems that, when it comes to mass marketing, consumers don't care
>  > about
>  >  > exact measurement, but they do care about size.
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  > Paul Trusten, R.Ph.
>  >  > Public Relations Director
>  >  > U.S. Metric Association, Inc.
>  >  > www.metric.org
>  >  > 3609 Caldera Boulevard, Apt. 122
>  >  > Midland TX 79707-2872 USA
>  >  > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >
>  > _________________________________________________________________
>  > On the road to retirement? Check out MSN Life Events for advice on how
> to
>  > get there! http://lifeevents.msn.com/category.aspx?cid=Retirement
>  >
>  >
> 
> 
> Paul Trusten, R.Ph.
> Public Relations Director
> U.S. Metric Association, Inc.
> Phone (432)528-7724
> www.metric.org
> 3609 Caldera Boulevard, Apartment 122
> Midland TX 79707-2872 USA
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://home.grandecom.net/~trusten
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Don't just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
> http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/

Reply via email to