Pierre, Pat & all:
Re-defining *metre* as: '1/10^5th of (pi/180) - i.e. ONE degree' as discussed in my posts since mid 2002, when tied with DECIMALISED *Hour of time of the day* has its advantages. Imagine: 24hx60mx60s = 24hx100mdx100sd maintain the existing 15-degree HOUR-Angle that make NO deviation BUT improves upon 'prevailing confusion' to Le Systeme Internationale d'Unites (SI-units). See: my contributions at: http://www.brijvij.com/ Also, see my e-book at: http://homepage.ntlworld.com/calendar.creations/BRIJ'S~2.PPT
Regards,
Brij Bhushan Vij
(Saturday, Kali 5107-W21-06)/265+D-254 G.(Monday, 2006 September 11H14:54(decimal) ET
Aa Nau Bhadra Kritvo Yantu Vishwatah -Rg Veda
Jan:31; Feb:29; Mar:31; Apr:30; May:31; Jun:30
Jul:30; Aug:31; Sep:30; Oct:31; Nov:30; Dec:30
(365th day of Year is World Day)
******As per Kali V-GRhymeCalendaar*****
"Koi bhi cheshtha vayarth nahin hoti, purshaarth karne mein hai"
Contact # 001(201)675-8548


From: Pat Naughtin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
Subject: [USMA:37283] Re: cm vs. mm
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 07:58:03 +1000

Dear Pierre and all,

On 11/09/06 2:30 AM, "Pierre Abbat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Who, besides Pat Naughtin, has observed that using centimeters slows
> metrication or recommends that centi- not be used? More generally, who
> advocates using only powers of 1000?

I have seen the idea of using 'only powers of 1000' in many places where it
is often referred to as the 'Rule of 1000'.

I suspect that this is not so much a rule of 1000 as it is a convenient way
to rid a particular area of measurement of fractions -- both vulgar and
decimal.

As an example, suppose that you are a soft drink bottler and you decide to
buy your ingredients in cubic metres (kilolitres) and litres and to sell
them in millilitres. You then write your company policy like this:

> The Pleasure Pops drink company will use millilitres, litres and kilolitres > for measuring volume or capacity ‹ centilitres, decilitres, decalitres, and
> hectolitres will not be used.

>From then on, there would be no further need for the use of any fractions.
Granted there would be turmoil and discussion when someone suggested a
container that was 1250 millilitres. Some would say that this goes against
the 'Rule of 1000' in that it has a number larger than 1000. Some would then
want to call this 125 centilitres to remove the trailing 0 and to bring it
back inside the 'Rule of 100' limit. Others would want to call it 'one and a
quarter' litres so that they could show off their knowledge of fractions.

However, if the policy (written above) was formulated and encouraged, there
would always be a definite policy advice that would invariably produce the
simplest possible practice.

By the way, for those who have not seen it, the article 'centimetres or
millimetres ‹ which will you choose' is available as a pdf file at
http://www.metricationmatters.com/articles/ and it is near the top. Although
it is a long article, you can get the sense of it by only reading the
introduction (2 pages) and the conclusion (3 pages).

Cheers,

Pat Naughtin
PO Box 305, Belmont, 3216
Geelong, Australia
Phone 61 3 5241 2008

Pat Naughtin is the editor of the free online monthly newsletter,
'Metrication matters'.
You can subscribe at http://www.metricationmatters.com/newsletter

Pat is also recognised as a Lifetime Certified Advanced Metrication
Specialist (LCAMS) with the United States Metric Association. He is also
editor of the 'Numbers and measurement' section of the Australian Government Publishing Service 'Style manual ­ for writers, editors and printers'. He is
a Member of the National Speakers Association of Australia and the
International Federation for Professional Speakers. See:
http://www.metricationmatters.com

This email and its attachments are for the sole use of the addressee and may
contain information that is confidential and/or legally privileged. This
email and its attachments are subject to copyright and should not be partly
or wholly reproduced without the consent of the copyright owner. Any
unauthorised use of disclosure of this email or its attachments is
prohibited. If you receive this email in error, please immediately delete it
from your system and notify the sender by return email.



Reply via email to