Hi Stan,

When I was working in Frankfurt (2000/1), I noticed many speed restrictions
on teh autobahn, particularly where there was a junction between two
autobahns.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "STANLEY DOORE" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "U.S. Metric Association"
<[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 6:39 AM
Subject: Re: [USMA:37389] RE: Metric and math


> The autobahn has no speed limits and 75 mph on it is too slow.
Occasionally
> people do drive 120 mph on it.
> Stan Doore
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Martin Vlietstra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 3:56 PM
> Subject: [USMA:37389] RE: Metric and math
>
>
> > It depends on how the movie portrays metric units - what is wrong with
the
> > dumb blonde with the all-American hero making a comment such as "What
120
> > mph" when the couple are driving up the autobahn, to which our hero
> > displays
> > his knowledge - "No dear, those are kilometers per hour - we are in
> > Germany
> > remember!".
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Bernard Rachtmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 5:59 PM
> > Subject: [USMA:37385] RE: Metric and math
> >
> >
> >> Anytime Don.
> >>
> >> The more recent move of the USMA to write in to movie studios could
> >> prove fruitful, as sports are somewhat difficult to influence.  The
mass
> >> media plays a great influence on our society- this is doubly true for
> >> youth.  Pressuring congressman to go metric is a good start, but maybe
> >> not grassroots enough.  I'd imagine they receive many letters on policy
> >> and agenda and metric makes up a very small portion.  There is also
some
> >> monied interests which may pressure them to drag their heels.
> >> Writing into studios and TV producers may be a good card to play.
There
> >> is no financial incentive for them to avoid metric in their
> >> scripts....its not like sponsors will pull out if they hear
> >> "kilometers"!  Plus, I doubt if they'd receive much in the way of
> >> anti-metric sentiments.  Most people who write into these shows/movies
> >> are fans asking about behind-the-scenes questions, so a pro-metric
> >> letter would stand out pretty well.
> >>
> >> But hey, if we really want to encourage metric to teens all we need to
> >> do is convince them their parents don't use metric and its a way to
> >> "rebel"!....LOL
> >>
> >> -best regards
> >>
> >> On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 11:35:29 -0400, "Don Jordan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> said:
> >> > Bernard, this is some good conversation. Thanks for the infomation
> >> > don jordan, USC
> >> >
> >> > Dr. Don M. Jordan
> >> > College of Arts & Sciences
> >> > Center for Science Education
> >> > Director: Center for South Carolina Academy of Science
> >> > Director: USC Science & Engineering Fair
> >> > Director: Middle / Elementary School Acad of Sci for South Carolina
> >> > Sumwalt Room 323
> >> > 1212 Green Street
> >> > University of South Carolina
> >> > Columbia SC 29208
> >> > Ph: (803) 777-7007
> >> > Fax (803) 7774396
> >> > email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >
> >> > >>> "Bernard Rachtmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 10/19 1:04 AM >>>
> >> > I'm not sure what the best approach is regarding math.  I do notice a
> >> > strong math-phobia, which is often satirized alongside technical
> >> > jargon.
> >> >  Few students go far in physics or chemistry, so much of the metric
> >> > association is with math.  This could be tackled by stressing metric
> >> > in
> >> > other areas as well and maybe (somehow) getting more inroads with
> >> > sports
> >> > or pop stuff.
> >> >
> >> > The math phobia goes into USC satire sometimes too... you hear
> >> > gripes/jokes about "A train leaves Chicago at 70 miles per hour
> >> > another
> >> > train heading 50 miles per hour..etc"  If metric was part of that
> >> > negative umbrella they would likely compound the equation as such.
> >> >
> >> > In truth some metric understanding is pushed in schools, but its
> >> > limited, and, if unused is largely forgotten.  Most high schoolers
> >> > spend
> >> > at least a year doing algebra but how many people on the street could
> >> > figure out a graphing equation or even a simple inequality?
> >> > I recall one teacher (he taught calculus) explaining to the class and
> >> > asking rhetorically why metric never caught on.  He then went on to
> >> > say
> >> > that a kilometer was longer than a mile, when asked about a race.
Its
> >> > a
> >> > simple error, but one that can only occur from lack of usage or
> >> > attention.
> >> >
> >> > I never really learned either measurement system in school.
Virtually
> >> > all of my understanding came from real-world observations and
> >> > experience.  In essence...you don't learn it without hands-on
> >> > experience.
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 16:47:32 -0400, "Brij Bhushan Vij"
> >> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >> > > Stan, Paul sirs:
> >> > > >.....My point is that introducing metric system in math classes is
a
> >> >
> >> > > >mistake. Why? Many people >suffer aversion to math. Americans in
> >> > particular
> >> > > >treasure math phobia, even pride in it.
> >> > > It is unfortunate that US & anti-metric forces consider
'ichhy.....'
> >> > in
> >> > > using SI-incere efforts that most children want in their school
> >> > > curriculur
> >> > > to learn & understand the Metric System - the Le Systeme
> >> > Internationale
> >> > > d'Unites (SI) way. Lableing metric learning wih 'math phobia' only
> >> > > enhanves
> >> > > the craze to learn it right; and denying the American young their
> >> > right
> >> > > to
> >> > > choose *what best holds in their learning* or its absense thereof.
> >> > > Looking forwards & learning Metrics will only add to American
> >> > democratic
> >> > > way
> >> > > of life.
> >> > > Brij Bhushan Vij
> >> > > (Sunday, Kali 5107-W27-00)/265+D-290 G.(Tuesday, 2006 October
> >> > > 17H16:79(decimal) ET
> >> > > Aa Nau Bhadra Kritvo Yantu Vishwatah -Rg Veda
> >> > > Jan:31; Feb:29; Mar:31; Apr:30; May:31; Jun:30
> >> > > Jul:30; Aug:31; Sep:30; Oct:31; Nov:30; Dec:30
> >> > > (365th day of Year is World Day)
> >> > > ******As per Kali V-GRhymeCalendaar*****
> >> > > "Koi bhi cheshtha vayarth nahin hoti, purshaarth karne mein hai"
> >> > > Contact # 001(201)675-8548
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > >From: "Stan Jakuba" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> > > >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > > >To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
> >> > > >Subject: [USMA:37361] Metric and math
> >> > > >Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 20:50:07 -0400
> >> > > >
> >> > > >This is an opinion concerning the emphasis USMA members have been
> >> > placing
> >> > > >on writing to math teachers & their organizations in the
expectation
> >> > that
> >> > > >it will help metricating the US.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >I am questioning the effectiveness of that effort. Math teachers
> >> > tell me
> >> > > >that they do teach metric; it is in the curriculum as any standard
> >> > subject.
> >> > > >They also support the vision of metric USA. And they cannot teach
> >> > metric
> >> > > >any more until they are told to do so. That is likely to happen
only
> >> > when
> >> > > >the country starts going metric again. When that push starts they
> >> > will do
> >> > > >more regardless our prompting; but they cannot initiate the push.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >Notice that their teaching metric in the past failed in
metricating
> >> > the US
> >> > > >if the metric USA was that goal (I know it was not). I believe
that
> >> > any
> >> > > >extra effort on their part will again be wasted. Worse yet: they
are
> >> > the
> >> > > >wrong group to teach or promote metric.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >My point is that introducing metric system in math classes is a
> >> > mistake.
> >> > > >Why? Many people suffer aversion to math. Americans in particular
> >> > treasure
> >> > > >math phobia, even pride in it. Fear of math is considered a
virtue.
> >> > The
> >> > > >media delight in prizing numerical ineptitude and ridiculing the
> >> > opposites
> >> > > >as nerds, geeks, etc. Associating metric with math turns many
pupils
> >> >
> >> > > >against metric. And it is the non-math types that will go into the
> >> > > >Government policy making.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >Metric need not be a math subject. If I remember my childhood ed,
I
> >> > heard
> >> > > >of the "metric system" in physics classes, not math. The Czech
> >> > lands, being
> >> > > >located in the center of Europe, had likely the same ed system as
> >> > the
> >> > > >continental countries (not England). Metric system and units
weren't
> >> > taught
> >> > > >in math classes because there is no math in metric. Math was
devoted
> >> > to
> >> > > >calculating. Measurements, for which one needs units, was left for
> >> > physics.
> >> > > >US math teachers "put" math (i.e., conversions) into the subject.
> >> > > >Otherwise, what would they do with all those hours allocated? And
> >> > they are
> >> > > >used to that - conversion calculations are a must in working with
> >> > the
> >> > > >English system.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >Relegating teaching of metric units to physics in the US would
take
> >> > away
> >> > > >the stigma of metric = math, and with it the "I am not good at it,
> >> > see no
> >> > > >use for it, forget it." This (majority) in the US population would
> >> > have one
> >> > > >less argument against metric. Introducing metric in physics or
> >> > similar,
> >> > > >non-math classes, on the other hand, cannot but enthuse students
for
> >> >
> >> > > >resorting to the metric system. They see how much simpler
solutions
> >> > to
> >> > > >problems are when using SI. Instead of aversion, they will develop
a
> >> > love
> >> > > >of both metric AND physics.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >For these reasons, I question the usefulness of "working with"
math
> >> >
> >> > > >teachers and their representatives to involve them in promoting
the
> >> > metric
> >> > > >cause. We should instead address curriculum developers, textbook
> >> > publishers
> >> > > >(non-math), and other such organizations.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >I am not against promoting metric among math teachers or any other
> >> > group.
> >> > > >But recognizing the limits on the time each of us has for the
> >> > metrication
> >> > > >effort, I am concerned that, with this group, that time is not
just
> >> > wasted,
> >> > > >it is counter-productive.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >Stan Jakuba
> >> > >
> >> > -- 
> >> >   Bernard Rachtmann
> >> >   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >
> >> > -- 
> >> > http://www.fastmail.fm - The way an email service should be
> >> >
> >> -- 
> >>   Bernard Rachtmann
> >>   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >> -- 
> >> http://www.fastmail.fm - The professional email service
> >>
> >
> >
>
>

Reply via email to