Dear Sam, Thanks for your question.
I have interspersed some remarks. On 6/2/07 12:39 PM, "Sam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Pat, > > I read your site and check regularly for updates however in your > article on "What is metrication" (and mentioned in previous articles I > believe) you state that the oil barrel (unit) never exited and has no > size. What I said, on the 'Why metrication?' web page, was: ** The first thing to know about the oil barrel is that it never existed. Oil is not put into standard barrels when it is pumped out of the ground and it never was! An oil barrel is a simply made up container that, in theory, holds 42 American (USA) gallons and this rounded whole number translates to 34.9726 Imperial gallons, 5.6146 cubic feet, 158.984 litres or 0.136 tonne (approx). When you notice that the West Texas crude oil price is (say) $63.60, how can you relate this to the $1.30 per litre that you are paying when you fill up your car? (By the way, $63.60 is equivalent to 40 cents per litre and $1.30 is equivalent to about $4.10 per gallon in the USA.) ** So let me be clearer. The oil barrel never existed. There never was a standard oil barrel supported by any international authority. As to the idea of a unit called a 'barrel of oil', not only has this existed there have been many of them. As you say, the Standard Oil Company chose one as did most (perhaps all) of the other oil companies. I believe that British Petroleum used one that was 35 gallons, Royal Dutch Shell used one that was 159 litres, and so on. As the idea of a unit called 'a barrel of oil' is not supported internationally, it is the decision of each company as to the size of a barrel. My source for the information that 'the oil barrel never existed' is the Permian Basin Oil Industry Museum near Midland in Texas (See: http://www.petroleummuseum.org/). > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barrel_of_oil > > According to wikipedia, a Barrel of Oil is exactly 158.9873 litres (42 > US Gallons). > > "However, the Standard Oil Company shipped its oil in barrels that > always contained exactly 42 U.S. gallons. Customers began to refuse to > accept anything less and by 1866 the oil barrel was standardised at 42 > U.S. gallons." Clearly the Wikipedia writer is using the decision made by the Standard Oil Company to use the 42 gallon figure for their own sales, and then assumes that this is an international 'standard'. The writer at http://www.slate.com/id/2115219/ also falls into the same trap. As a point of interest the date you mention, 1866, was the year when pipelines, tanker rail cars, and bulk oil barges effectively killed off any need for all of the differently sized barrels. Coincidentally, 1866 (July 28) was also the year that President Andrew Johnson signed The Kassen Act (codified as 15 USC 204 et seq.) into law. This Act made it lawful throughout the USA 'to employ the weights and measures of the metric system'. Sec. 204. Metric system authorized: 'It shall be lawful throughout the United States of America to employ the weights and measures of the metric system; and no contract or dealing, or pleading in any court, shall be deemed invalid or liable to objection because the weights or measures expressed or referred to therein are weights or measures of the metric system.' As a side issue, the writer at http://www.slate.com/id/2115219/ also falls into the trap of the 55 gallon steel drum (and the 42 gallon barrel) when he writes: 'Though barrels may be close to extinct, companies still ship some oil in 55-gallon steel drums. (Volumes for these are still given in 42-gallon "barrels.") The steel drums used in calypso music are made from these 55-gallon containers. The first appeared in Trinidad, shortly after the end of World War II.' When the steel oil drum was developed in Germany in the 1930s, it was specifically designed to hold 200 litres of petroleum product and also allow for a small air space for expansion. After the second world war, these drums travelled widely from their native Germany because of their usefulness. As they crossed each international border, the local people dumbed down 200 litres to local volume measures. For example, the 200 litre drum became the 55 gallon drum in the USA to suit the old Queen Anne wine barrel in use there. At the English border the 200 litre drum became the 44 gallon drum to suit the 1824 Imperial decimal gallon. You can find a lot more misinformation about this -- look at how the 50 millimetre and 20 millimetre bung sizes have been changed to nominal inch sizes for example -- at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/44_gallon_drum > "The Standard Oil monopoly was broken up into 34 different companies > in 1911. Oil has not been shipped in barrels for a very long time[2] > but the "blue barrel" is still the standard unit for measurement and > pricing of oil in the U.S. today." This does not make sense. Petroleum products are quite sensitive to changes in temperature so if you want to buy or sell large amounts in volume units -- and you don't want to be cheated -- you need to apply temperature density factors that effectively mean that you are buying by mass (kilograms and tonnes) rather than by volume. All oil traders know this, they know that they need to adjust for temperature sensitivity so they effectively buy in mass (kilograms and tonnes) and, because the public is not so aware of temperature changes, the oil traders sell by the more variable volume (litres all around the world or gallons in the USA). > > Whereas you wrote: > > "...they simply calculate a theoretical oil price based on a > theoretical oil barrel of unspecified size.." > > 158.9873 litres (42 US Gallons) > > "- and that never existed -" > > "However, the Standard Oil Company shipped its oil in barrels that > always contained exactly 42 U.S. gallons. Customers began to refuse to > accept anything less and by 1866 the oil barrel was standardised at 42 > U.S. gallons." > > Looking forward to hearing from you, I am concerned that I have not made myself clear in my original article. I will try to rephrase my thoughts along the lines outlined above as soon as I can. Thanks again for your question. Cheers, Pat Naughtin PO Box 305, Belmont, 3216 Geelong, Australia Phone 61 3 5241 2008 Pat Naughtin is the editor of the free online monthly newsletter, 'Metrication matters'. You can subscribe at http://www.metricationmatters.com/newsletter Pat is also recognised as a Lifetime Certified Advanced Metrication Specialist (LCAMS) with the United States Metric Association. He is also editor of the 'Numbers and measurement' section of the Australian Government Publishing Service 'Style manual for writers, editors and printers'. He is a Member of the National Speakers Association of Australia and the International Federation for Professional Speakers. See: http://www.metricationmatters.com This email and its attachments are for the sole use of the addressee and may contain information that is confidential and/or legally privileged. This email and its attachments are subject to copyright and should not be partly or wholly reproduced without the consent of the copyright owner. Any unauthorised use of disclosure of this email or its attachments is prohibited. If you receive this email in error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender by return email.
