Given the last paragraph of the NAM/EABC memo, I'm wondering if there are any members of those groups who have contacts at FMI to help find a way to resolve the FMI's opposition to amending the FPLA.
Don? Anyone? Ezra -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: "Mike Millet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I'm glad to see they do support amending the FPLA. > > Mike > > On 5/9/07, Hillger, Don <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Here's the page which links to NAM's position on passage of the FPLA > > amendment. See last paragraph. > > > > > > > > http://www.eabc.org/policypapers/EABC-NAM_policy_Metric_Labeling.html > > > > > > > > As Bill Hooper already noted on the listserv, NAM is important in that > > without its support the FPLA would likely not be amended as needed for > > metric-only labeling. > > > > > > > > > > > > Don Hillger > > > > USMA Webmaster > > > > www.metric.org > > > > USMA list owner > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > "The boy is dangerous, they all sense it why can't you?"
--- Begin Message --- I'm glad to see they do support amending the FPLA.
MikeOn 5/9/07, Hillger, Don <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:Here's the page which links to NAM's position on passage of the FPLA amendment. See last paragraph.
http://www.eabc.org/policypapers/EABC-NAM_policy_Metric_Labeling.html
As Bill Hooper already noted on the listserv, NAM is important in that without its support the FPLA would likely not be amended as needed for metric-only labeling.
Don Hillger
USMA Webmaster
USMA list owner
--
"The boy is dangerous, they all sense it why can't you?"
--- End Message ---
