Given the last paragraph of  the NAM/EABC memo, I'm wondering if there are any 
members of those groups who have contacts at FMI to help find a way to resolve 
the FMI's opposition to amending the FPLA.

Don? Anyone?

Ezra

 -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: "Mike Millet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I'm glad to see they do support amending the FPLA.
> 
> Mike
> 
> On 5/9/07, Hillger, Don <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >  Here's the page which links to NAM's position on passage of the FPLA
> > amendment.  See last paragraph.
> >
> >
> >
> > http://www.eabc.org/policypapers/EABC-NAM_policy_Metric_Labeling.html
> >
> >
> >
> > As Bill Hooper already noted on the listserv, NAM is important in that
> > without its support the FPLA would likely not be amended as needed for
> > metric-only labeling.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Don Hillger
> >
> > USMA Webmaster
> >
> > www.metric.org
> >
> > USMA list owner
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> "The boy is dangerous, they all sense it why can't you?"


--- Begin Message --- I'm glad to see they do support amending the FPLA.

Mike

On 5/9/07, Hillger, Don <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:

Here's the page which links to NAM's position on passage of the FPLA amendment.  See last paragraph.

 

http://www.eabc.org/policypapers/EABC-NAM_policy_Metric_Labeling.html

 

As Bill Hooper already noted on the listserv, NAM is important in that without its support the FPLA would likely not be amended as needed for metric-only labeling.

 

 

Don Hillger

USMA Webmaster

www.metric.org

USMA list owner

 

 

 




--
"The boy is dangerous, they all sense it why can't you?"
--- End Message ---

Reply via email to