>>>We are an old country. Our literature and our folksongs are peppered with
references to traditional measurements. 
 
No problem here.  I'm sure a lot of us are Anglophiles.
 
>>>I know we should not be sentimental. Just because something is familiar
does not mean it is better than any of the alternatives.
 
Agreed. At least we're reasonable to this point.
 
>>>It is because we all understand them, and they work.
 
Errr....  That's precisely why I use metric.
 
>>>we were all trained to be rather good at mental arithmetic
 
I'm great at mental arithmetic.  "16 oz" = 16*3 = 48, add zero = 480 ml.
About a half liter.
 
>>>>How often did 6s 4d go into £123 9s 9d? No problem.
 
???????!!!
 
Case closed.  These people must be smoking somthing.
 
Nat
 
 
 
 

  _____  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Carleton MacDonald
Sent: Wednesday, 2007 May 09 22:28
To: U.S. Metric Association
Subject: [USMA:38635] Stone me! pounds and ounces are saved



Fire away … there’s room for comments at the bottom.

 

The Telegraph never uses metric in its stories – always imperial only.

 

Carleton

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2007/05/10/do1003
.xml
<http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2007/05/10/do100
3.xml&DCMP=EMC-new_10052007> &DCMP=EMC-new_10052007

 

 

Reply via email to