You are right!  Why else would there have been two coins in circulation, one
with a value of 2s (one tenth of a £) and the other 2s 6d (one eight of a
£).  Britain adopted the decimal system of coinage just as the computer
revolution was starting – although I never did it, it would have been hell
writing programs that added pounds shillings and pence, especially when
every computer system in the world provided facilities to do so using
decimal numbers only.

 

  _____  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Linda D. Bergeron
Sent: 12 May 2007 15:42
To: U.S. Metric Association
Subject: [USMA:38662] RE: Reaction to the Telegraph

 

It still sounds like the wave equation would be easier to work with;-)

Linda





 


  _____  


From: Pierre Abbat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
Subject: [USMA:38661] RE: Reaction to the Telegraph
Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 10:16:34 -0400
On Saturday 12 May 2007 09:12, Nat Hager III wrote:
> This sounds like solving the Schrödinger wave equation to calculate
> electron orbitals! Are £123 6s 4d and £123 6s 8d separate spin states? Do
> they follow Fermi exclusion principle?

There's a "p" missing - because it wasn't invented yet. s is the shilling, p
the new penny, d the old penny, and f the farthing. ;)

Pierre




  _____  

PC <http://g.msn.com/8HMBENUS/2746??PS=47575>  Magazine’s 2007 editors’
choice for best Web mail—award-winning Windows Live Hotmail. 

Reply via email to