Hi Martin:
Sorry you are disappointed with WeatherBug. It is designed for the United 
States and not the world.  It's what I'm primarily interested in where I live, 
work and play.  If I need wx for foreign countries I go to the NOAA NWS or to a 
commercial site like you do.

WeatherBug does give detailed wx info.  It gives dozens of obs and forecasts in 
Montgomery County, MD alone from many elementary, middle and high schools.  I 
assume the weather info sites you like for foreign countries have the same 
detailed data for their areas such as the  WeatherBug has for Montgomery 
County, MD in the US.  Right?  Please let me know where I can get similar 
detailed info from various provinces in other countries such as areas in and 
around Garmisch, Manheim or Heidelberg, Germany.

There are many commercial wx info sites which have weather info for airports 
around the world because that's  where established obs and forecast info has 
been and will be available in various forms for aviation primarily and for 
other purposes.  Those data have been and are exchanged internationally 
regularly via the weather Global Telecommunications System.  It's been that way 
for many decades at least dating back to the 1950s and 1960s.

Regards,  Stan Doore




  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Martin Vlietstra 
  To: U.S. Metric Association 
  Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 4:13 PM
  Subject: [USMA:38721] RE: metric weather web sites


  Hi Stanley,

   

  I tried Weatherbug out - I was disappointed, I could not get London's weather 
forecast, nor could I get my home town (population 30,000)

   

  Martin

   


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  From: STANLEY DOORE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: 17 May 2007 03:54
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; U.S. Metric Association
  Subject: Re: [USMA:38713] RE: metric weather web sites

   

  Martin et al:

  If you go to www.weatherbug.com you will find that ALL parameters toggle 
between English and metric units when you click on the switch just below the 
temperature.  Wind speeds are in km/h, rainfall in mm,  temperature in tenths 
of degrees C etc.  It's very readable and user friendly.

   

  The weather observation instruments are located on many  elementary and high 
schools in addition to airports throughout the US.  Therefore it shows a very 
dense local network of observations while it provides many local, regional and  
national weather charts, and radar and satellite images from the NOAA National 
Weather Service than those sites you reference.   Try it.  You'll like it.  

  Stan Doore

   

   

   

    ----- Original Message ----- 

    From: Martin Vlietstra 

    To: U.S. Metric Association 

    Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 5:10 PM

    Subject: [USMA:38713] RE: metric weather web sites

     

    I normally use www.wetteronline.de (it is in German) and, apart from 
wind-speed is 100% metric.  If you use www.weatheronline.co.uk, you get the 
British version - same graphics, metric and imperial.  However, try using 
www.weatheronline.com and you get everything that the USMA (and UKMA) are 
fighting against - you would not know that it is related to the other two 
sites.  The German and UK sites have links to each other and to the Dutch and 
Chinese sites, but the US site is totally separate (is it run by a different 
company?).

     

    On all the European sites mentioned (and probably the Chinese site, though 
I have not explored it), wind speeds are given in a variety of units - 
Beaufort, km/h, m/s. mph and knots with the ability to select the units of your 
choice.

     


----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of King, Mark D.
    Sent: 16 May 2007 21:31
    To: U.S. Metric Association
    Subject: [USMA:38712] metric wether web sites

     

    I tried the "metric" setting on www.weather.com, and it changes everything 
except pressure (still listed in inches).  I wrote to them, asking whether this 
was an oversight or by design, but have yet to receive a reply.

     


----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of STANLEY DOORE
    Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 10:23
    To: U.S. Metric Association
    Subject: [USMA:38707] Re: Is U.S. metrication still considered "extreme?"

    Many of the weather web sites have a toggle which allows you to view 
weather data in either English or SI.  Try www.weatherbug.com and see.  Note 
that rainfall in SI is shown in millimeters rather than centimeters.

    Stan Doore

     

     

     

      ----- Original Message ----- 

      From: Mike Millet 

      To: U.S. Metric Association 

      Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 11:05 AM

      Subject: [USMA:38706] Re: Is U.S. metrication still considered "extreme?"

       

      Every doctor scale I've been weighed on uses both SI and USC. Also, the 
scale my vet uses to weigh our German Shephard is digital and  can do both.  

      On the weather issue, I agree that it'd take a coordinated change, but I 
highly doubt you'd see a resistence to it as much as you might think. I think 
they would have to start doing forecasts in both units and then slowly phase 
out Farenheit.  Most banks and other digital signs display both metric and USC 
temps when you drive by them and when I learned them it was very helpful in 
school learning them in pairs (0C,32F,20C,70F etc) 

      But it would take a concerted effort.

      Mike

      On 5/16/07, Bill Hooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: 

       

      On 2007 May 16 , at 10:15 AM, STANLEY DOORE wrote: 

       

      It would take the medical industry to require weighting and recording 
people's mass in the SI.  This also would require a complete change in scales 
to show and record  in SI units.  Very expensive but doable.

       

      My doctor already has a scale that weighs in kilograms, but he doesn't. 
It is a digital scale that can weigh in either pounds or kilograms at the touch 
of a switch. His nurse weighs me in pounds (which I carefully don't look at) 
and when she is done, I throw the switch and get my mass in kilograms (and I 
tell the nurse what it is). 

       

      So, for some doctors at least, recording masses in SI would not "require 
a complete change in scales" as Stanley suggests (above). It would just take 
the touch of a switch. I suspect many other doctors have similar scales. 

       

      Here's where the federal government could have a significant impact. They 
should require by law that all scales (and other measuring instruments) should 
be able to measure in SI, in addition to Ye Olde English mix of units. Doctors 
(and others) could continue using them to measure in old units but when the 
time came that the national will is to go metric, it would not require any 
massive purchase of new instruments; it would just take the touch of a switch. 

       

      Bill Hooper

      73 kg body mass*

      Fernandina Beach, Florida, USA

       

      * plus or minus a kilogram or so.

       

       




      -- 
      "The boy is dangerous, they all sense it why can't you?" 

Reply via email to