I would love to agree with you.  But unfortunately, I started the argument for 
a reason: I wanted
to know whether to get km/L or L/100 km bumper stickers.  I think I've made a 
decision after all
this, though for obvious reasons I don't want to say it. :)

Now let's discuss the question of "total Joules" versus "average Watts" when 
talking about US
electricity use in a given calendar year.  (kidding, kidding!!)

--- Bill Hooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I find this bickering over the relative merits of measuring how a car  
> uses gasoline (L/km vs. km/L), is counterproductive, irrespective of  
> whether 100 L is used instead of 1 L.
> 
> BOTH are correct.
>   Both are useful,
> EACH one being more useful than the other in certain considerations  
> while
> the other may be more useful in different situations.
> 
> All your arguments that "this one is better than that one" or vice- 
> versa boil down to nothing more than;
>     "The one I am familiar with is the best."
> That statement should be expanded by saying,
>     "The one I am familiar with is the best ONLY BECAUSE I AM FAMILIAR  
> WITH IT."
> 
> The reason I find this kind of argument so disturbing is that it is  
> the same argument that metric opponents use to argue for keeping their  
> old non-metric units. They are "familiar" so people see them as being  
> "better" (even when they are not).
> 
> If we fail to see these two situation as being the same thing, then we  
> can never understand the rational of metric opponents. And if we can't  
> do that, we will never find ways to convince them that metric is better.
> 
> Let's turn our energies into finding ways to persuade people that  
> familiar things are NOT better just because they are familiar, and to  
> consider the advantages of using metric instead of the "familiar" old  
> non-metric units.
> 
> Let's stop getting bogged down arguing whether L/km is better than km/ 
> L. The arguments I have seen or no better than the argument that "feet  
> are better than metres because feet are more familiar".
> 
> 
> Bill Hooper
> 1810 mm tall
> Fernandina Beach, Florida, USA
> 
> ==========================
>     SImplification Begins With SI.
> ==========================
> 
> 
> 



      
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ 

Reply via email to