You are correct.  Sorry for the omission.

The reason I think it's amazing isn't because of our capacity to move objects.  
I'm a computer
nerd.  My PC draws hundreds of watts.  Humans beings are constantly processing 
genetic information
(in a way) and our brains are capable of some impressive processing as well.  
All this in under
100 watts impresses me.

The human brain draws only about 20 watts according to what I've read elsewhere 
on the net.

Anyway, wouldn't it be nice if we could just plug in to a wall outlet and save 
having to buy all
those carbohydrates?  I need to invent an electric glucose generator.  Of 
course, I'm sure it's
been tried before.

--- James Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Right you are, David. I always told my physics students that humans are 
> rated at about 120 W for men and 80 W for women.
> 
> For a man, a 10 MJ/d diet is about right. That works out to an energy 
> intake rate of about 115.8 J/s or nearly 116 W. That's also 
> approximately the heat dissipation rate for men. I've seen programs that 
> calculate air conditioning loads and they usually figure about 100 W per 
> occupant. In other words, a person is like a 100 W heater that is on all 
> the time. So if you want to air condition classrooms, etc., you have to 
> allow for people as well as heat intrusion from outside, heat output by 
> lights, etc.
> 
> I think that Jesse meant to write "human energy intake rate" instead of 
> "human energy intake", since power is a rate of energy transfer. He just 
> dropped a simple but important word there.
> 
> Jim
> 
> 
> David King wrote:
> > Energy is measured in joules, power in watts.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > David King
> > /Metric is British and best!/ Speak in English, Measure in Metric
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Ziser, Jesse wrote:
> >> That data left out something I think is a cool metric factoid: a healthy 
> >> adult human energy
> intake
> >> is around 100 watts average.  That just blows my mind.  To use no more 
> >> average power than a
> light
> >> bulb, we must be phenomenally efficient.  Ain't nature cool?
> >>
> >> --- Stan Jakuba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>   
> >>> I came across data from Scientific American mag. that ad light to the 
> >>> distinction in
> measuring
> >>> power and energy by showing when to resort to one or the other.
> >>> Stan J.
> >>>     
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>       
> >> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> >> Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
> >> http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
> >>
> >>
> >>   
> 
> -- 
> James R. Frysinger
> 632 Stony Point Mountain Road
> Doyle, TN 38559-3030
> 
> (H) 931.657.3107
> (C) 931.212.0267
> 
> 



      
____________________________________________________________________________________
Looking for last minute shopping deals?  
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.  
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping

Reply via email to