Yeah, it really makes one wonder why New York is not responding.

The only additional ray of hope I retain is that, once we have a Democrat in 
the White House and increased majorities in the Congress, we can get the 
amendment to the FPLA passed. That would add leverage by providing the argument 
that New York and Alabama need to adopt the amended UPLR to bring all the 
labeling regulations into alignment.

Ezra

 -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: "Ziser, Jesse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Why don't we try to get the public involved in these kinds of things?  I 
> mean, 
> rather than
> pleading with government agencies, shouldn't we be out trying to win over 
> individual people, and
> get enough people on our side to really put some pressure on the government?  
> Can't we get some
> feet on the pavement in NYC, post up some flyers, get some folks organized?  
> We 
> could email
> professors and students at colleges in the area that might be friendly to 
> such 
> things, try and get
> some younger people fired up enough to draw attention to this cause.
> 
> On the upside, you would get a lot more people out there talking to these 
> government agencies.  On
> the downside, you would probably stir up some opposition.  But how many 
> people 
> really get riled up
> against the metric system?  I mean most people who don't like it don't even 
> take 
> it seriously,
> right?
> 
> Just trying to be helpful.
> 
> --- Paul Trusten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > I have done all I can with the New York State Department of Agriculture and 
> Markets, Bureau of
> > Weights and Measures, to get it to adopt the metric-only labeling option of 
> the NCWM's Uniform
> > Packaging and Labeling Regulation (UPLR), but with no favorable result as 
> > yet.  
> New York and
> > Alabama remain the only two U.S. jurisdictions (all the territories have 
> adopted it) that have
> > not given permission for this option.  Why not, New York?  Take a look at 
> > the 
> opening section of
> > your weights and measures law: 
> > 
> > 
> > � 176. Declaration of policy and purpose. The legislature hereby finds
> >   and  declares that voluntary and orderly conversion to the metric system
> >   of weights and measures is of vital importance to  the  economy  of  the
> >   state.  It  is  hereby declared to be the public policy of this state to
> >   encourage the gradual implementation of the metric system throughout the
> >   state's  government,  industry,  commerce,   business,   education   and
> >   agriculture. This article is enacted in the exercise of the public power
> >   in  order to encourage such implementation and to provide a revised code
> >   of weights and measures which will be  responsive  to  the  present  and
> >   future  needs of commerce, industry and consumers. The legislature finds
> >   and declares that the coordination and administration  of  this  unitary
> >   regulatory  system  governing  weights and measures throughout the state
> >   should be, and is hereby, vested in the commissioner of agriculture  and
> >   markets  and that enforcement of this article by the counties and cities
> >   of the state shall be under his supervision.
> > 
> > Paul Trusten, R.Ph.
> > Public Relations Director
> > U.S. Metric Assocation
> > 3609 Caldera Blvd. Apt. 122
> > Midland TX 79707-2872 USA
> > +1(432)528-7724
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
>       
> ________________________________________________________________________________
> ____
> Be a better friend, newshound, and 
> know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
> http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
> 

Reply via email to