By changing to litre, the cost per litre would be about a quarter of a 
gallon.  That would not require changing the mechanical pricing mechanism.  It 
doesn't make sense to change to half-gallon pricing.  Therefore, it does make 
sense to go to quart/litre pricing.
   The total cost mechanism may still be a problem and the volume measurement 
mechanism also may be a problem unless it can adjust to measure litre 
quantities.
    Stan Doore

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Nat Hager III 
  To: U.S. Metric Association 
  Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 11:32 AM
  Subject: [USMA:40907] RE: gasoline by the liter


  A news article this morning on the subject.  No mention of liter pricing 
though.

   

  http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/05/12/old.gas.pumps.ap/index.html?iref=newssearch

   

  Nat

   

   

  -----Original Message-----
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Frysinger
  Sent: Tuesday, 2008 May 13 10:50
  To: U.S. Metric Association
  Subject: [USMA:40906] gasoline by the liter

   

  Sent a few minutes ago to the Petroleum Equipment Institute:

   

  Recent articles indicate that once again our nation's older gasoline 

  pumps are near the end of their capabilities for recording sale prices 

  and rates.

   

  The time has come for PEI to dust off a technique used by Shell in the 

  early '70s when this problem also arose. We should start selling 

  gasoline by the liter and make it a permanent feature.

   

  All but two states now allow metric-only labeling of products and one of 

  those two is about to join the group. The Fair Packaging and Labeling 

  Act is expected to be amended soon to allow metric-only labeling on 

  federally controlled goods. The U.S. is moving towards metric packaging 

  and unit pricing. Water, fruit juices, and even milk in some areas are 

  being sold by the liter and half-liter. Americans understand liters.

   

  Jim

   

  -- 

  James R. Frysinger

  632 Stony Point Mountain Road

  Doyle, TN 38559-3030

   

  (H) 931.657.3107

  (C) 931.212.0267

   

Reply via email to