Great letter Stan!

If I were a member of the SAE, I would echo your letter to the editor of 
Automotive Engineering.

Gene Mechtly.
---- Original message ----
>Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 14:08:35 -0400
>From: "Stan Jakuba" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
>Subject: [USMA:41030] Fw: letter to editor  
>To: "U.S. Metric Association" <[email protected]>
>
>   Anyone to support this letter to ed?
>   The SAE (Society of Automotive Engineers) used to
>   publish its Automotive Engineering mag. in SI (only)
>   a decade ago. Situation deteriorated to dual units,
>   often I-P first. The deterioration was caused, as
>   told, by an anti-SI letter campaign of some 6 or
>   8 letters (mostly from retirees). Apparently, that
>   few letter can change a publishing policy.
>   Undoubtedly, there was a background work by someone
>   - the person who might have instigated all them
>   letters!. Anyway, each letter counts.
>    
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: Stan Jakuba
>   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   Sent: 08 Jun 04, Wednesday 12:08
>   Subject: letter to editor
>   Dear Editor:
>    
>   I want to compliment you and Mr. P. Wright on the
>   contents and the use of units in the "F1 Moves
>   Toward Hybridization" article (AE, May 2008, pg 60).
>    
>   It summarizes the status and options in the energy
>   storage devices well and it uses SI units
>   throughout. In particular, I appreciate the lack of
>   the annoying conversions to other units with 
>   the energy and power values. I wish, in the future,
>   all articles dealing with energy, power, densities,
>   etc. were in SI (only).
>    
>   Using SI units and prefixes makes comparisons among
>   energy numbers in any industry, be it automotive,
>   oil, agricultural, or power, immediate. They
>   eliminate the need for conversions among the
>   plethora of energy units (Btu, kWh, therms, joules,
>   etc.) along with the not-so-rare conversion errors.
>   Values in SI let us compare among capital outlay
>   such as $/W or $/m², costs such as heat in fuel or
>   electricity (both in $/GJ), the amount of space
>   taken in W/m³, area power density in W/m², annual
>   road vehicle consumption in joules (EJ), annual
>   average power in watts (GW), energy contents in
>   J/m³ or J/kg, vehicular energy consumption in J/m,
>   etc. Once everyone use SI, we'll be better
>   positioned for cooperation in evaluating alternative
>   energy options. In all fields of engineering, by
>   using SI we will soon remember the unified reference
>   values for power, energy, space, cost, rates,
>   densities, etc. because the numbers will be
>   repetitious and ubiquitous. Cross-disciplines
>   communication becomes easier. The multi-meaning
>   numbers "billion", "milliard" and similar words
>   causing confusion today will become clear when
>   replaced with the giga, mega, or whatever
>   appropriate, prefix.
>    
>   SAE is now SAE International. Let's use the
>   international system of units to help SAE members
>   communicate easier outside the US as well as among
>   ourselves.
>    
>   Stan Jakuba
>   SAE member. '70
>   S I Jakub Associates
>   43 Westbrook Rd
>   West Hartford CT 06107
>   Tel: 860 521 7924
>    
>    
>    

Reply via email to